Kerry's Foreign Policy Plan

If Kerry's elected, what will he do?

  • Kerry will hunt and find terrorists wherever they are.

  • Kerry will make sure that our kitchen chairs are not empty.

  • Kerry will begin to withdraw our troops from Iraq in 6 months.

  • Kerry will broaden our coalition (despite France and Germany not participating and despite him losin

  • Kerry will (other--please explain below).

  • Kerry doesn't have a plan.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Originally posted by peachgirl
At the risk of being so giddy that mermaid02 completely loses it, just because a foreign country was violating UN resolutions doesn't mean they can't be convinced to do otherwise.

It gets tiresome typing that over and over, but it's a fact.

So it is your opinion that had someone other than George Bush been President, someone like, say, John Kerry, then France, Germany, and Russia would have joined the coalition? Might have joined the coalition? 50/50 shot? Slim but possible? Possible but not probable? Any of those close?

Richard
 
Originally posted by Elwood Blues
You forgot one.

The report also stated that SH's plan after the sanctions were lifted was to restart his WMD programs.

And now that Iran is close to (or already does have) a nuclear weapon, do you really think that SH would just sit back an do nothing to counter that? Me thinks not.

Don't know about anyone esle but that's be good news to me.

Oh, we forgot another one. . .the report also acknowledged the possibility that the weapons could have been removed prior to our invasion.

So, had Bush not come down on Saddam, well, there COULD have been weapons there afterall.
 
So, your argument is empty!

No, yours is. I never said specific countries.

That would make our war with Iraq "legit".

No, nothing will do that. But, now that we're there the job has to be finished. Better that we have others to help than continue to go it alone.


Now, how would more diplomacy have helped, knowing what we know now?

I doubt we would have gone to war at the time we did had anyone but Bush jr been in office.


Since France wasn't being paid off back then

Do I have to say the Poland thing again????
 
Originally posted by peachgirl
No, yours is. I never said specific countries.

No, nothing will do that. But, now that we're there the job has to be finished. Better that we have others to help than continue to go it alone.

I doubt we would have gone to war at the time we did had anyone but Bush jr been in office.

Do I have to say the Poland thing again????

Of course you never said specific countries, but, has your candidate said specific countries? He is participating in the DISmANTLING of our coalition. . .so does he want to REpLACE the countries that are supporting us? What's his plan? That's the point. What countries are he referring to if not France and Germany?

Okay, I understand your second point. Again Australia. Again France and Germany. They didn't HAVE to announce to the world that they wouldn't support Kerry in the event that he is elected, but they chose to do that. So, can you be more specific?

Third point:I think, and many others do, as well, that we were CORRECT to go into Iraq. So, I'm not sure there's anything to discuss right here. According to the intelligence that we had, Iraq was a threat.

Final point: Well, Poland did the right thing and took a lot of risks by supporting us, despite all. Chirac has already stated that France will still not join the coalition even if Kerry is elected. So, I don't understand your point. Russia has had its share of hardship and has its own battles to fight. I think we will be successful in forging a stronger alliance with them in this regard.
 

This is my take on the situation. Why in the world would Bush make up all this information to drag us into a war. He was going to be running for another 4 more years. So he had alot to loose if things went bad. He handled a situation totally different than any president in our time has had to deal with. He handled the war on terrorism with strength and determination. He is no phony. What you see is what you get. Kerry's plan is to what????? What in the world is this guy going to do. Is all the countries going to give Kerry a welcoming party and offer their services for whatever is needed? Come on. I could careless what this guy has to say in a debate. President Bush has proven he is a tough and strong leader.
 
Originally posted by peachgirl


Modernize The World's Most Powerful Military To Meet New Threats


Right now the president is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to research bunker-busting nuclear weapons.


I'm going to shut that program down

That sounds like cuts to me, not modernizing.

I still haven't heard a response to Kerry's sister in Australia either, how can he bring new allies when he is tearing down old ones?
 
Dan Rather, CBS News Anchor
1) given documents he thought were true
2) failed to thoroughly investigate the facts
3) reported documents to the American people as true to make his case
4) when confronted with the facts, apologized and launched an investigation
5) number of Americans dead: 0
6) should be fired as CBS News Anchor

George W. Bush, President of the United States
1) given documents he thought were true
2) failed to thoroughly investigate the facts
3) reported documents to the American people as true to make his case
4) when confronted with the facts, continued to report untruth and stonewalled an investigation
5) number of Americans dead: 1100
6) should be given four more years as President of the United States
 
Originally posted by LoraJ
Dan Rather, CBS News Anchor
1) given documents he thought were true
2) failed to thoroughly investigate the facts
3) reported documents to the American people as true to make his case
4) when confronted with the facts, apologized and launched an investigation
5) number of Americans dead: 0
6) should be fired as CBS News Anchor

George W. Bush, President of the United States
1) given documents he thought were true
2) failed to thoroughly investigate the facts
3) reported documents to the American people as true to make his case
4) when confronted with the facts, continued to report untruth and stonewalled an investigation
5) number of Americans dead: 1100
6) should be given four more years as President of the United States

First of all, I could care less if Dan is fired or not, I've never watched him. Secondly, IMHO, if Kerry had voted NO to give the President the authority TO GO TO WAR, this would be a whole different race. He didn't vote no, he voted YES, he didn't vote yes to threaten war, or to give more sanctions, he voted YES to go to war. The UN was doing enough of the threatening and it wasn't working. Thirdly, again IMHO, hind-site is 20/20, Kerry can point out every mistake made, he has not laid out any plans to fix what's there. Sorry, but I'm not swayed just by him saying he can start pulling out troops in 6 months. I can't believe him when he says he will build stronger alliances, and then has his sister go over and speak out against our Australian ally, and then to have France and Germany say they won't get involved even if Kerry is elected.
 
Originally posted by peachgirl

His choice, his responsibility to be sure he's right.

Yep. And he exercised it well. To know what they knew then and do ANYTHING differently than they did would have been grossly irresponsible. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Doesn't have any relevance to how someone acts in an emergent situation.

Not to worry though. I hear rumor that ABC intends to give Kerry help in making his case so you can rest easy.
 
Originally posted by Galahad
Not to worry though. I hear rumor that ABC intends to give Kerry help in making his case so you can rest easy.
I take it that your information comes from a "reliable" source......?
 
Originally posted by dumboiu
I take it that your information comes from a "reliable" source......?

Not particularly reliable no. That's why I said it was a rumor. But actual text from the source is included, so there might be something to it. In any case, it, sadly, no longer surprises me.
 
Did anyone notice that the asked questions remained unanswered? I knew that would be the case, since Kerry has wavered on every issue and stance he has taken.
 
Originally posted by Kendra17
Did anyone notice that the asked questions remained unanswered? I knew that would be the case, since Kerry has wavered on every issue and stance he has taken.

I notice that Bush didn't bother to answer the last question just given to him.

Name 3 decisions you made that you believe were wrong....he totally ignored her.

Not particularly reliable no. That's why I said it was a rumor.

That's nice....ridiculous rumors that have no basis in fact. I can't begin to tell you all the stories that are going around about Bush. Or, rather, I won't. I think it's irresponsible to post stories that are nothing more than mud slinging.
 
Originally posted by peachgirl
I notice that Bush didn't bother to answer the last question just given to him.

Name 3 decisions you made that you believe were wrong....he totally ignored her.

I thought his answer was right on target. When he answered he didn't think he had made a mistake last time, the press didn't let go of it--hey, Disboard folks haven't let go of it! What on earth were you expecting? That he would say he regrets his major decisions? His supporters don't regret his major decisions, and I am confident that he still stands by them, as well.
 
Originally posted by peachgirl
I notice that Bush didn't bother to answer the last question just given to him.

Name 3 decisions you made that you believe were wrong....he totally ignored her.


Oh, let me add. . .I see you were thinking I meant the candidates during the debate. . but, I wrote that at 8:00 pm central time, and therefore it's obvious that I was talking about the questions I posed in the OP regarding Kerry's foreign policy. Australia. Broadening the coalition. Everything on this thread that others besides me have asked regarding kerry's intended policies. Those questions have remained unanswered and, sadly, even after this most recent debate, they STILL remain unanswered.

That may lead the Conservatives to conclude that even Kerry's supporters can't explain their candidate's stance.
 
That's nice....ridiculous rumors that have no basis in fact.

Perhaps. Several news sources have the memo now and it doesn't appear to be forged (not sure if they've looked at the typeface yet thought).
 
Originally posted by peachgirl
I notice that Bush didn't bother to answer the last question just given to him.

Name 3 decisions you made that you believe were wrong....he totally ignored her.

He certainly didn't ignore her. Spoke right to her. President Bush did answer her question. He said he made some appointments that were a mistake, but he wasn't going to name them on TV and embarass them.

I think President Bush did a fine job last night.
 
George W. Bush, President of the United States
1) given documents he thought were true
2) failed to thoroughly investigate the facts
3) reported documents to the American people as true to make his case
4) when confronted with the facts, continued to report untruth and stonewalled an investigation
5) number of Americans dead: 1100
6) should be given four more years as President of the United States
Your analogy breaks down at step 2. Presidents don't personally fact check intelligence... they can't. I can't see Bush flying around the world and interviewing source personally and such. Such work is left to such agencies as the NSA and the CIA... The end product was the documents and analysis presented in step 1 of your analogy.
 
Originally posted by dumboiu
How about Bush's plan??????????? I have yet to hear what it is......

That wasn't the question. Nice diversion attempt, though.
 
Originally posted by peachgirl
Since he says he will not give other countries veto power over the safety of the U.S., it's not hard to figure out, that if need be, he would go it alone. It's also not too hard to figure out why Bush had so much trouble getting a significant coalition together....HE WAS LYING.


The difference is that he doesn't start out with the lone cowboy attitude that Bush does and is much more likely to convince our allies to join us, much as Bush's father did. I expect Kerry to be much more effective in dealing with foreign countries than kick *** George is.

Bush Jr would have done well to learn a thing or two about diplomacy from his father.

First, who in the world is Bush, Jr? :confused:

The more Kerry and those supporting him repeat this "lie" mantra, the more ridiculous and intellecutually dishonest you sound. To believe this one would have to beleive the UN, the UK, Eqypt, Jordan, Germany, Russian, Australia, France, Spain, Poland, Clinton, Kerry himself, Gore, Kennedy, Daschle, Gephardt, Lieberman, Edwards, (shall I go on?) were in on the lie. Pretty incredible consiracy if you ask me. Shall we again bother to list those in the Clinton administration (including Clinton himself) that said Saddam's WMD's were a threat? Not wanting to embarrass you position or anything, but I would like to see someone explain those comments against this "lie" theory. At least try.

Second, okay, no stockpiles of WMD were found (doesn't mean they never exisited). We can harp on this all we want, but at this point it is now irrelevant. We are in Iraq, we can't change that. So, the question is, what is Kerry's plan to deal with that. Saying that he would have done it differently doesn't tell me jack! Doesn't tell me what he will do. Hell, I would have chosen different Powerball numbers knowing what I know now.

And, given that France, Germany and Russia were on the take (talking about knowing then what we know now!) and are on record as saying they won't commit troops and given that Kerry has acknowledged that, what is Kerry left with as far a a coalition goes? Oh, that's right. We won't know his plan unitl Jan 20th.

KERRY: Well, Don, I realize that, but the fact is that the president is the president. I mean, what you ought to be doing and what everybody in America ought to be doing today is not asking me; they ought to be asking the president, What is your plan? What's your plan, Mr. President, to stop these kids from being killed? What's your plan, Mr. President, to get the other countries in there? What's your plan to have 90 percent of the casualties and 90 percent of the cost being carried by America? I mean, he is the president today, and we have given him advice from day one; from day one, from the floor of the Senate when we debated it where I said don't -- you know, you've got to have other countries with you, don't make an end runaround the U.N., the difficulty is not winning the military, it's winning the peace; and he ignored it. And others -- the bipartisan, D!ck Lugar, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, and Joe Biden, and the Foreign Relations Committee gave him advice that he chose to ignore. And since then, many times we've stood up and said, "Mr. President, this is what you have to do." He's chosen not to do those things.


(From his interview on the Imus show)
KERRY: Well, Don, I realize that, but the fact is that the president is the president. I mean, what you ought to be doing and what everybody in America ought to be doing today is not asking me; they ought to be asking the president, What is your plan? What's your plan, Mr. President, to stop these kids from being killed? What's your plan, Mr. President, to get the other countries in there? What's your plan to have 90 percent of the casualties and 90 percent of the cost being carried by America? I mean, he is the president today, and we have given him advice from day one; from day one, from the floor of the Senate when we debated it where I said don't -- you know, you've got to have other countries with you, don't make an end runaround the U.N., the difficulty is not winning the military, it's winning the peace; and he ignored it. And others -- the bipartisan, D!ck Lugar, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, and Joe Biden, and the Foreign Relations Committee gave him advice that he chose to ignore. And since then, many times we've stood up and said, "Mr. President, this is what you have to do." He's chosen not to do those things.

IMUS: We're asking you because you want to be president.

KERRY: That's correct. But I can't...

IMUS: He's not going to answer any questions.

KERRY: I can't tell you what I'm going to find on the ground on January 20th.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom