poohandwendy
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2001
- Messages
- 18,961
That is sad, prayers out to his loved ones. He was young, that is a shame.
Mermaid02 said:This isn't karma- EVERYONE is going to die. People with high stress lives/jobs very often have heart attacks. This was a merciful death frankly. Let's see- die of a heart attack in a couple of hours or spend the last years of your life in prison? I'd take the heart attack.
Shocking! A 60-year old man knows people that have died! Maybe the Democrats should investigate!TheDoctor said:Evidently, according to Tony Snow the official line is that Ken Lay was not a friend of Bush but merely someone Bush knew (and a number of people bush knows have died over the years).
brerrabbit said:I worked for Enron for seven years and lost a considerable amount of money when Enron went bankrupt. For me I am just glad its all over and that I have gone on with my life. It hurts to think of what I lost but then again you just have to go on because there is nothing I can do about it.
TheDoctor said:A talk jock on clear Channell was asking people if they thought that he was really dead.
Evidently, according to Tony Snow the official line is that Ken Lay was not a friend of Bush but merely someone Bush knew (and a number of people bush knows have died over the years).
JudicialTyranny said:Shocking! A 60-year old man knows people that have died! Maybe the Democrats should investigate!![]()
BTW, a number of people Bill Clinton knew have died also - Arkancide!

Charade said:You beat me to it JT.![]()
Let's not forget that he managed to sell off his stock when others couldn't.back2disney said:Lay is not to blame for your lack of diversification. He is just a scapegoat or diversion from the tech bubble and crash.
escape said:Let's not forget that he managed to sell off his stock when others couldn't.![]()
Personally, I do feel for his family...in the sense that they lost a family member.
back2disney said:Lay is not to blame for your lack of diversification. He is just a scapegoat or diversion from the tech bubble and crash.
back2disney said:Not his fault, insider trading is much worse and occurs all the time.
Are you saying that it's not his fault that he didn't get charged with insider trading?March 28, 2006, 11:48PM
The sneaky withdrawal of Ken Lay
By LOREN STEFFY
Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle
The Enron trial broke for halftime Tuesday as prosecutors rested their case and jurors were left with a lingering image: Joanne Cortez crying in a stairwell.
You probably hadn't heard of Cortez before Tuesday, but she is among the thousands who worked in obscurity at Enron, guided by something in short supply in the executive offices: integrity.
Her title was "senior specialist," and she monitored the revolving lines of credit that Enron extended to its chairman, Ken Lay, and several other top executives.
Under an arrangement with Enron's board, Lay could repay his loans from the company with Enron stock. By August 2001, after Jeff Skilling resigned as chief executive, Cortez said she noticed Lay used stock to repay the entire $4 million on the credit line with stock, then borrowed the same amount the next day. The pattern of borrowing and repaying with stock continued into the fall, Cortez said.
"It made me question if this was being used as somewhat of a tool to sell shares," she said.
Bingo. More specifically, Lay was using it to convert his Enron stock into cash, to monetize his holdings, which were falling in value. Normally, a corporate officer would have to report stock sales to the Securities and Exchange Commission, but by selling shares back to the issuer, Lay wasn't required to.
Log of deception
As Lay's secret fire sale continued, Cortez became more suspicious, and she began to document the transactions, logging every loan, every repayment with stock.
The results were stunning: In 2001, Lay borrowed a total of $77 million from Enron. He eventually repaid, with stock, about $70 million, Cortez said.
Cortez said she became increasingly concerned as the transactions picked up in August and September 2001, in part because investors had no idea what Lay was doing.
Then in mid-October, just before Enron employees found themselves locked out of their 401(k) plan and unable to sell their own stock, Cortez learned that Enron's board increased Lay's line of credit by $3.5 million. That's what sent her sobbing into the stairwell.
"I walked down the stairwell to blow off steam. I was upset. I cried," she said. "I was very upset that his line of credit increased to $7.5 (million) when the company was in so much trouble."
She didn't sell
Cortez was herself an Enron shareholder. She'd been buying the stock through payroll deduction. Unlike Lay, though, Cortez said she never sold.
"I didn't think I should do that," she said. She worried that sales based on her knowledge of Lay's loans could constitute insider trading.
"It's a clear indication that something is going on, for the CEO to be selling so much stock," she said on the stand. "I felt that it wasn't public knowledge, that shares were being sold back to the company to repay his line of credit."
Cortez checked the company's proxy statement for the previous year and found it claimed Lay had repaid his credit line in full. Which he did, and then drew it down again. At Enron, partial truth passed for full disclosure.
So Cortez took her records of Lay's transactions and contacted a lawyer, who in turn gave them to the FBI.
The defense tried to explain Lay's actions. He needed the money to meet margin calls on other investments. Not entirely. Some of the money was used to pay off the mortgage on his River Oaks condo, according to bank records produced by prosecutors.
Besides, Lay agreed to more detailed disclosures of his loans for the 2001 proxy, his attorney said. Of course, we'll never know because Enron collapsed long before it filed the proxy, and long after Lay had cashed out. It's just another unfulfilled promise, like the $7 million for which Lay stiffed his own company in its final days.
Two-faced talk
After court, Lay's attorney, Mike Ramsey, said the testimony was a "unique situation in which the government ended its case with a charge that doesn't exist."
He means that Lay isn't charged with insider trading, which is true. He's charged with conspiracy.
Lay's sales came as he told shareholders and employees that things had never been better, as he implored them to buy the stock. The sales show a man preparing for the end he knows is coming, that he knew that Enron's financial decay had grown fatal.
Down a stairwell, sobbing, so did Joanne Cortez.
brerrabbit said:How can you say this? You have no earthly idea how I was or am invested. The money I lost at the crash was stock held by Enron in my name that I could not withdraw, sell, or otherwise diversify. I diversified plenty after I left the company. My loss as a result was only a little over $200k. Had I done nothing with my portfolio I would be whining about the lose of over $4.8 million. Thousands of employees who were still working at Enron and less than 50 years old had no opportunity to diversify their Enron holdings as that is Federal Law. Think about what you say before you make sweeping statements about things you don't know anything about.