I am a happy owner at SSR , I think its a beautiful property and enjoy the fact that is not so close to the action SOMETIMES. Other times I want to be close to the parks and in the preverbial "thick of things". Thats why its cool that you have a resort like SSR in my opinion, its a Totally diffrent vaction experience that the properties that are closer to the parks. I will not say ON SITE cause thats just not true, reguardless of what you mean , on site is on site, that means in Disney world property not next to a theame park.
I have been traveling to Disney since the 70s with my family and have lost count how many times I have been there on vacation, now that I have my own family I was thrilled to be fortunate enough to be able to afford my share of the magic. That being said I chose to be a SSR owner. Its a little more removed from the hustle and bustle, its right next to downtown and offers more food choices than the other resorts just a 5 minute walk away.Whats to hate about that? In my book, not a thing.
I have been theme parked to death over the years and find that I can burn through all of them in a 7 day stay in 3 to 4 days and be satisfied enough that I have seen everything I need to see. I than enjoy a SSR atmosphere to spend the rest of my vacation. Thant being said let me switch gears.
I completly understand and agree with the points that the disgruntled posters are making. If Im to pay top dollar for my
DVC membership why should my home resort not be up to par with the others? As great as I think SSR is, when looking at some of the convience and amenitites the other resorts do have, its not a fair comparision if you are truly putting the properties through the microscope. Because I have enjoyed the world for almost 30 years does not mean that the rest of the owners have and they may want to be in the thick of the action, with all the rooms that SSR offers this will impact those owners. Thats not fair, IMO.
As other posters have stated, make a pool of all pools, some special theamed Disney something that makes SSR stand out, so people feel they are getting a deluxe resort even though they are not on top of the parks. (even though they are still on property/on site

)
As much as I love SSR and its concept and pools and spa and grounds ,close proximity to DTD and PI, I totally understand where people are comming from when they say it falls short of the others. As other posters have said , wanting the most for our money is not a bad thing.
That being said, I do love SSR and I am totally happy there, for the reasons I have stated, that does not make me any less of a person, or knowlegable consumer, its just what I like. I do expect most however would enjoy the 100 mile and hour pace of a resort thats close to the parks, has poolside service, ect ect. Just dont tell me im less of an anything cause I like the resort I like. I dont feel that the posters being given a hard time in this thread are doing that, they just want quality to be equal to all when it comes to the extra special stuff.
