Just can't justify it... staying onsite

I say if you are on the fence about it and can afford it just do it. We just got back this morning from our 8 day trip to CA that included 5 days and 4 nights at DLR and we opted to stay off site at the Candy Cane Inn after all the great reviews I saw here on the disboards because we too could not seem to justify the $$$ per night to stay on site. And for us it was a bad call. The off site motels that are close to the entrance are just that, a motel. I thought that we would be fine as long as we had a place to sleep and shower that was close and clean, but at the end of the day we just really missed not being at Disney. We have stayed at value, mods, and deluxe at WDW and enjoy all three so I just think for us it really is important to stay on site. We regretted not making that decision. Obviously what works for us may not work for you but I just wanted to share our thought process when planning and the reality once we got there. We did not realize until now how important it is for us to stay on site and so for future trips we decided that for us if we can't afford to stay on site than we can't afford to go to Disney lol. But it's what makes us happy and now we know. Anyways that's what happened with us :goodvibes
 
Well, then I am the Queen of the Weird People, whoever, because I greatly prefer the more spacious PPH rooms (with daybeds) over those cramped, dark GCH rooms (many of which do not have daybeds)!:rotfl2:
The GCH rooms with day beds have a wonderful view..... of the parking lot and the DLH/PPH... with that, I would agree. That being said, the GCH is the only hotel with balconies. The balcony is an extension of the room, and are never dark ;) With the balcony included you will see the rooms aren't as cramped as you would have previously thought.

I did like the short walk from the GCH to DTD or the parks the last time I stayed there, but the first time I stayed there I did not have a short walk. And I, of course, love the lobby -- that whole hearth/lobby environment wins out over the PPH or the DLH.
My first time staying, I had a long-ish walk as well. Every time since its been great though. With that long-ish walk, it was actually very short going into DTD due to the "secret" stairs in that wing.

Also, I have gotten better perks -- and much better views!! -- staying at the PPH than I did at the GCH. The perks and views were based on good timing and luck, but I didn't have that same good timing and luck when I stayed at the GCH, so the PPH wins that battle for me! The PPH has made a couple of mistakes here and there, but I still prefer that hotel. But I'm just weird, I guess.
There are indeed some great views up high to be had at the PPH. I'm sure NORMALLY you are going to pay through the nose for those views however. I too have had great views at the GCH.... paying for a standard room and getting free upgrades.

That's not to say that I wouldn't stay at the GCH at some point in the future if the planets aligned -- I am sure I would -- but I am just not crazy about the rooms..
Yep... definitely weird ;)

We seriously debated doing the DLH for our next trip, but can't ever pull the trigger on anything but the grand.
 
We just think the view at PPH can't be beat. It makes our trip. DLH just didn't "do it" for us, but lots of people love it. I stayed off-site last summer and it was fine, but it's not the same for us. Maybe if we had never stayed onsite, but we did. Lol.
 
I have never been able to justify $400 a night or even $300 a night. That always added up to what could have been the upgrade for all of us to get annual passes. More Disney was always better than less Disney.

We have stayed onsite once at GCH but it was with Gay Day rates of $225 per night and we used our Disney Reward Dollars to pay most of the room total. We stayed 3 nights and after our DRD our bill was $201 for our whole stay! We enjoyed it immensely but will never stay onsite again unless we can do the same type of deal.

I would like to try a stay at Paradise Pier with a theme park view room or Cabana room someday though.
 
kkmcan said:
I have never been able to justify $400 a night or even $300 a night. That always added up to what could have been the upgrade for all of us to get annual passes. More Disney was always better than less

Yes!
 
We stayed at the PPH the first week in June. It was worth it to us because we came from Louisiana and I know we will not be there again for a very long time. It is much easier for us to get to WDW. The early entry every morning was important to us because I have a toddler who gets up very early in the morning. We were able to get lots done early in the mornings. Also, since I know it will be years before we get to return we really wanted to stay at a Disney resort. No, it is not as important to be "on site" at DLR as it is in WDW, but it was important to us. If we were more "local" and could make more frequent trips I might feel otherwise. I think each family's situation is unique and you just have to weigh the pros and cons to decide if it is worth it or not for your trip.
 
I have never been able to justify $400 a night or even $300 a night. That always added up to what could have been the upgrade for all of us to get annual passes. More Disney was always better than less Disney.

We have stayed onsite once at GCH but it was with Gay Day rates of $225 per night and we used our Disney Reward Dollars to pay most of the room total. We stayed 3 nights and after our DRD our bill was $201 for our whole stay! We enjoyed it immensely but will never stay onsite again unless we can do the same type of deal.

I would like to try a stay at Paradise Pier with a theme park view room or Cabana room someday though.

Not worth it to us, either. I called to see what rates they had for our next trip coming up and the cheapest room they had was 1,400 per night. That was with the 40% military discount. I asked about the AP discount and it was so much even the CM was in shock. "that's not very economical" is what she said, lol. So we're staying at the HoJo for 159.
 
We stayed at the PPH the first week in June. It was worth it to us because we came from Louisiana and I know we will not be there again for a very long time. It is much easier for us to get to WDW. The early entry every morning was important to us because I have a toddler who gets up very early in the morning. We were able to get lots done early in the mornings. Also, since I know it will be years before we get to return we really wanted to stay at a Disney resort. No, it is not as important to be "on site" at DLR as it is in WDW, but it was important to us. If we were more "local" and could make more frequent trips I might feel otherwise. I think each family's situation is unique and you just have to weigh the pros and cons to decide if it is worth it or not for your trip.

I guess I'm the toddler in our family. :)

I'm up at the crack of dawn every day. Usually before. And since we're coming from the central time zone, I was up hours before the parks opened every day. It was the daily EE that hooked me. It would have driven me nuts to be up pacing the floor waiting for the parks to open every day.
 
I've enjoyed reading through this entire thread and reading everyone's opinions.
We (me, DH, DD22, DD18, DD14) live in Texas, and have been blessed to be making our 10th year in a row trip to Disney. We save all year long, because this is what our family loves. Disneyland is truly our Happy Place.

When the kids were smaller, we were open-to-close, can't drag the kids out of the parks kind of people. We would stay for six days. Offsite, because that's how we afforded it.

Now that the girls are older, we have decided that we LOVE Paradise Pier, and would rather stay less days in the parks to stay there. We love, love, love waking up to the view of the sunrise over the mountains. Love the Disney touches. Love walking through the grand.

This year, we are staying three nights, with four day park hoppers. Two of my girls graduated this past May. One from college, one from high school. As a surprise, I have upgraded us to concierge for the first time.

If the only way we can go to Disneyland is to stay offsite, we do. But if we can afford onsite, we always will. Because it is a big part of the magic for us. :goodvibes
 
I called to see what rates they had for our next trip coming up and the cheapest room they had was 1,400 per night.

Wow, that is really odd. The onsite hotels are expensive but I'm not even paying that much for a two room suite with club level the week between Christmas and new years:confused3 I think someone gave you some bad info.
 
Wow, that is really odd. The onsite hotels are expensive but I'm not even paying that much for a two room suite with club level the week between Christmas and new years:confused3 I think someone gave you some bad info.

I wondered about that too. Maybe there were some tickets/Hoppers involved in the package as well? Maybe there was more than one room being booked?

The hotel rooms alone -- especially through a room-only booking -- should not even come close to $1,400 per night. Maybe $1,400 for the whole stay, in total. I'm not sure that anyone would be staying at any of the Disneyland Resort hotels if they were $1,400 per night, without tickets and just including basic, standard rooms.
 
I wondered about that too. Maybe there were some tickets/Hoppers involved in the package as well? Maybe there was more than one room being booked?

The hotel rooms alone -- especially through a room-only booking -- should not even come close to $1,400 per night. Maybe $1,400 for the whole stay, in total. I'm not sure that anyone would be staying at any of the Disneyland Resort hotels if they were $1,400 per night, without tickets and just including basic, standard rooms.
No, no park tickets, nothing. JUST the room, and it was even a regular room since we're taking my MIL and we can get 2 regular rooms instead of a suite. I never call, I just check the room rates online, but a military family friend of mine said I should call because she gets great military rates, so I called. that was the quoted rate for military. One room. So, I thought, maybe they only have a certain number of rooms set aside for military, so I asked about the AP discount and it was almost 2k per night.

So, we booked the HoJo.

We always stay on site at WDW, and have stayed deluxe there. I have no problem paying for a nice room. But every time I look online for room prices they are always about 500 bucks per night, for a single room. And we'd need 2 because we have 4 kids. Totally not worth it.
 
In July, I don't want to be more specific than that. It was not the 4th, though. It's never a good idea to broadcast when you are going to be gone for several days.
 
In July, I don't want to be more specific than that. It was not the 4th, though. It's never a good idea to broadcast when you are going to be gone for several days.

True!

I'm wondering -- did you happen to call and get the rates while we were still in 2013? I know that sometimes the DLR Reservations system and rates seem to not be updated until January 1st -- or at least much closer to the travel dates in question -- so if you happened to call last year about staying onsite in 2014, I wonder if the Reservations system was even up to date at that point.

In any case, it's a lot of money and HoJo's will be good!
 
Are you getting a suite or something? Theres a little variation throughout the month, but only by view availability and most nights do have standard or woods/courtyard open. There are a few days where you'd get forced into a Theme Park View, but under half that $1400/night quoted
 
I looked also and it looks like rack rates range around $440.00 plus tax. Military discount should be 40% off that (I think). The two room suites only run around $1200.00 (same discount) unless they were quoted one of the fantasy suites and I can't imagine it that high.

Not that you won't enjoy HoJo's but I think someone steered you wrong.
 
Not worth it to us, either. I called to see what rates they had for our next trip coming up and the cheapest room they had was 1,400 per night. That was with the 40% military discount. I asked about the AP discount and it was so much even the CM was in shock. "that's not very economical" is what she said, lol. So we're staying at the HoJo for 159.

There's no way. Someone got very mixed up on this, because it would never be that high for one room. Even two. Your post here says $1400 for one basic room and there just isn't such a price as $1400 for that. You could stay in the Fairytale Signature Suite for $800, and that includes concierge. I don't know where those numbers came from, as I can't even imagine a CM being that clueless. And that's with a military discount? Sorry, but that's a ridiculous number.
 
but a military family friend of mine said I should call because she gets great military rates

I just wanted to add that the Disneyland Hotel, and the reservation cm's usually bend over backwords for military families. They have gone as far as somehow finding me rooms that they were supposedly sold out of when they learned we were coming for a pre-deployment trip. Once, I purchased a hopper ticket for my son because he was arriving until moring and we didn't want to have to wait the next morning we wanted to get right in(I know, we're a little crazy). They made sure we took that ticket back to the booth and got refunded for what we paid over the military rate and they just treated him so wonderful for the whole trip. I just feel bad that you didn't get the proper rates and treatment.
 
Hi, SweetAlex!:wave:

You know, I can't mention too many more pros or cons (or justifications) to staying onsite other than what's already been mentioned. I can add in my two cents, though.

As Jamie and others have said, there is really no right or wrong answer. Everyone agrees -- even the onsite fans -- that the hotels are very expensive. So then it comes down to whether or not it is worth it. For some people, the hotel is part of the whole experience, whereas others view it as only a place to shower and sleep and that's it. That's not something that is right or wrong; it's just how people view their trips.

Also, depending on how one tours the parks -- some go at breakneck, commando speeds and others stroll about more leisurely -- there may be more room in the schedule to spend at the hotel than in other folks' schedules.

A big reason why I love to stay onsite is because I already live in SoCal (Los Angeles) -- I am roughly 45 minutes from DLR on a non-traffic day. It's fairly close, comparatively speaking. I need to feel that I am "escaping" the city somehow, so I can totally immerse myself in the Disney magic. When I go to DLR and have a "special" trip (like for the holiday season, every year) with a hotel stay, I want to stay onsite because it is part of the Disney Bubble.

To stay at one of the places on Harbor or nearby (which I might do at some point in the future; never say never) would not seem like much of an "escape" to me. I need to feel as if I am staying somewhere that I couldn't access closer to home, in my own neighborhood! Staying at DLR hotels makes it more of a vacation for me, rather than just a 45-minute ride away from home. Does that make sense?

I like to be on Disney soil from the moment I step out of the car to the second I get in the car to go home. I like waking up and going to sleep on Disney property. I love coming back to the hotel for a break, or after a long, tiring day, and being greeted with a friendly "Welcome home," or a warm smile. My views from my last several PPH rooms have been awesome, and I gravitated to the window every time I was in the room. I like hunting for hidden Mickeys in the carpeting, bedding and details around the room and in the hotel property. I love the walk back to the hotel through DTD, especially during the holidays.

Overall -- and I have said this in other threads about this subject in the past -- there is an intangible, indescribable feeling attached to staying onsite...for those who "get it." I am not expecting someone who doesn't want to stay onsite to set foot in one of the onsite hotels and suddenly get swept up in that same feeling. Again, it's really more of a "thing" that people who love staying onsite already know and understand.

When onsite, guests smile at each other as they pass in the hallways or lobbies. People actually talk to each other in the elevators (which doesn't happen in my neighborhood). Cast Members -- from Valet to Bell to Mousekeeping to the ones manning the front desk -- are delightful and helpful, and will usually go above and beyond the call of duty to accommodate guests. Mostly everyone is in a good mood. It's as if everyone has been kissed by that special Disney magic and is caught up in it...which is fine by me, as there are enough grumpy and miserable people to deal with in "real life."

And I guess that really sums it up. Staying onsite -- for me -- feels like I am getting away from real life. It completes and enhances the whole DLR experience for me.

This makes total sense. Thanks for your input. Living in LA... yes, I think I could use a complete separation from the city during vacation too. :thumbsup2. This coming from someone who just moved from a big city to a little itty bitty town of 9,000 in the mountains (surrounded by everything BUT people and buildings).

I would really like to stay onsite one day, just to feel the whole complete submersion thing that everyone talks about. At this point though in our lives, there are so many other things that I would like to spend $1,000 on so it's hard to justify but maybe one day, those other things will be less important than a GCH stay and we won't even bat an eye on a decision to stay onsite.

Thanks to all! :goodvibes
 





Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE



New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom