Jodi Arias Trial Part 4, starting with redirect of "expert" Dr Samuels, March 19

I meant soap suds/lather. I don't use soap, either, but my body wash still makes a foamy lather in the shower.

Remus, is that what you meant, also? No lather/suds?

Yes, no sign of soap or suds.

I don't keep my soaps/shower gel/shampoos/conditioners/sugar scrubs/body polish or anything in my shower, it's all in the cupboard and I take it out as needed. Most days I average at least two baths/showers and one of them is always to warm up or just think. He could have been taking a shower just to relax, but the door open is what makes no sense. There would be water everywhere. In Vegas, we had a shower like his, though more showerheads and bigger....I flooded the bathroom EVERY day. Maybe that just says something about my inability to shower without making a mess...so hmm...what was I saying (I sound like Jodi!), she either whipped the door open and surprised him, or he was okay with a wet bathroom floor. I don't even know anymore. Here's hoping that someday she comes forth with the truth. She won't, but it would be nice.

I think that's why the water's not on at a better blast in the picture, kwim?

I don't plan on buying candy, but they figure they can make more money for a while. They figure if your desperate you will still buy it..:rotfl:

LOL, when my wife shops for candy she's got a list of requests from this household. :teeth:
 
I don't keep my soaps/shower gel/shampoos/conditioners/sugar scrubs/body polish or anything in my shower, it's all in the cupboard and I take it out as needed. Most days I average at least two baths/showers and one of them is always to warm up or just think. He could have been taking a shower just to relax, but the door open is what makes no sense. There would be water everywhere. In Vegas, we had a shower like his, though more showerheads and bigger....I flooded the bathroom EVERY day. Maybe that just says something about my inability to shower without making a mess...so hmm...what was I saying (I sound like Jodi!), she either whipped the door open and surprised him, or he was okay with a wet bathroom floor. I don't even know anymore. Here's hoping that someday she comes forth with the truth. She won't, but it would be nice.

You're right about that. She'll go to her death bed spouting off her innocence and how she was attacked and defended herself. :rolleyes2
 
I don't plan on buying candy, but they figure they can make more money for a while. They figure if your desperate you will still buy it..:rotfl:

I have bought no candy! :banana: My husband on the other hand ... :rolleyes1 I told him just keep it on a high shelf where I can't reach it, and all will be well. :laughing:
 
The DT is not finished yet.



WildAboutTrial‏@WildAboutTrial3h
@valaxie No, court resumes tomorrow at 9:15. Grace Wong from InSession takes the stand about the Juan autograph incident.


Also, the DT has filed a motion for Mistrial citing Juror Misconduct:



http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.g...rtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR2008-031021



3/31/2013

MOT - Motion - Party (001)

4/1/2013





NOTE: MOTION FOR MISTRIAL: JUROR MISCONDUCT



3/31/2013

OBJ - Objection/Opposition. - Party (001)

4/1/2013





NOTE: DEDEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO ELICITING TESTIMONY OR MAKING ARGUMENT RELATED TO AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES FOR WHICH PROBABLE CAUSE HAS NOT BEEN FOUND
 

:scared1: You are kidding me! That's what I was so afraid of. Thanks for posting the info, reelmom.
 
The DT is not finished yet.



WildAboutTrial‏@WildAboutTrial3h
@valaxie No, court resumes tomorrow at 9:15. Grace Wong from InSession takes the stand about the Juan autograph incident.


Also, the DT has filed a motion for Mistrial citing Juror Misconduct:



http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.g...rtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR2008-031021



3/31/2013

MOT - Motion - Party (001)

4/1/2013





NOTE: MOTION FOR MISTRIAL: JUROR MISCONDUCT



3/31/2013

OBJ - Objection/Opposition. - Party (001)

4/1/2013





NOTE: DEDEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO ELICITING TESTIMONY OR MAKING ARGUMENT RELATED TO AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES FOR WHICH PROBABLE CAUSE HAS NOT BEEN FOUND


Those show a docket date of today, maybe the WS court observer will report back to them if it was in open court.
 
Due to the fact that the one juror sits out front and eating the ice cream.

Also the good ole Doc took down his website for now as well.
 
Which post, page? I looked for it.

Pretty sure it was this:

5-27_zps4360d9e4.png


That it, usnuz?
 
Due to the fact that the one juror sits out front and eating the ice cream.

Also the good ole Doc took down his website for now as well.

Is that why the DT is claiming juror misconduct? ... Or is that why the DT is calling another witness about the JM autograph-gate? ... :)
 
Due to the fact that the one juror sits out front and eating the ice cream.

Also the good ole Doc took down his website for now as well.

For real? Is this because Jingasuarus said a juror might be able to see something out front or is this something totally different?

I guess Samuels doesn't want to have to have his tail handed to him again on the stand for future trials.
 
Pretty sure it was this:

5-27_zps4360d9e4.png


That it, usnuz?
Yes, I have never seen it before.
Is that why the DT is claiming juror misconduct? ... Or is that why the DT is calling another witness about the JM autograph-gate? ... :)

From what I understand they are calling that older lady to the stand the one that Juan sign her cane. All these jurors should have been taken some where else to leave the court house and instructed not to sit out front. But that one is not Juan's fault. Can't control someone.
 
Motion is for getting juror #5 dismissed for saying something to another juror. Not sure what was said.
 
http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/nation...ays-hearing-what-to-expect-when-arias-returns

I just read this article online ... I quoted two parts below ...

I wonder if this has to do with the Juror Misconduct motion? ...

At least one juror often lingers outside the courthouse after trial has concluded for the day while spectators mull around, cameras at the ready, waiting for Martinez and others to emerge.

On Thursday, Judge Sherry Stephens privately questioned each juror individually about whether they had witnessed Martinez's interactions with the crowd. Jurors in the case are not sequestered but are warned daily by the judge to avoid all media coverage of the trial.

But within an hour of court ending Thursday, one juror sat eating ice cream on a bench near a group of spectators who were waiting for the prosecutor.

Martinez chose to take a different exit Thursday afternoon and avoided the scene.

And I wonder if this has to do with either the Juror Misconduct motion or the JM Misconduct claim? ...

Another In Session employee is set to be questioned by the judge when trial resumes Tuesday

Ugh ... I was worried that this whole picture/autograph BS thing was going to turn into a big :headache: ... I hope the judge will just squash it and the trial can move on ...
 
Motion is for getting juror #5 dismissed for saying something to another juror. Not sure what was said.

Oy :sad2: ... I think the judge better get control of her courtroom and start moving things along better and faster ... I get a feeling that everybody is starting to get a bit antsy and this trial could end up totally unraveling if she doesn't rein it in ...
 
From another source the juror said something in the closed hearing with the judge that was in favor of prosecutor and negative with Jodi.......Hmmm...does that give you a clue of how these jurors are thinking , possibly? They made the comment to another juror, if that is the case why do they only want the one juror off and not the other one?
 















Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE







New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top