SeaSpray
Disney World fan since 1976
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2001
- Messages
- 15,143
Originally posted by goofy4tink
Just adding my .02 worth, but isn't it all about context?? I have no problem with women's anatomy. None whatsoever. However, a guy ripping part of any woman's clothing off is NOT entertaining.
I totally agree. I am very comfortable watching the movie "Titanic" with my DSs ages 15 and 12, including the scene where they show the young Rose posing nude for the artist Jack, who is sketching her. I think the human body is a beautiful thing and nothing to be ashamed of. It's ALL in the context. Same thing with a woman who is breastfeeding her baby. Not that I go out of my way to have my DSs view naked women, especially at their ages, but when it turns up occasionally in an appropriate context, I have no problem with that. My DSs do NOT watch MTV, they hate all that type of music. They like bands such as Barenaked Ladies (lol!), Creed, the Beatles, etc. We took DSs to their first concert, Barenaked Ladies, when they were ages 12 and 9.
Anyway, my point is, most of us parents do NOT object to the form of a naked woman's body, but it was the context in which it was presented, AND the lack of pre-warning. If it was a malfunction of a costume, then that's a shame for everyone involved, but you know what, obviously it WAS planned that he was going to grab at something or some part of her costume, which still is NOT appropriate, so they ended up getting burned when playing with fire. (These are MY opinions and as such, I won't defend by debating this with anyone, so save yourselves the trouble of arguing YOUR opinions, with me).
As for Kid Rock, he's just untalented and ridiculous anyway, and there's no excuse for what he did.