Remember the commericals that ran a few years ago, about the role the media has is determining the "message" ?( I think they were CBC Heritage commericials, or something). Well, all this election talk has me asking the question: Is the media the message?
I wonder how much influence the media had in determining the way the votes were cast. For example, every day for the last few weeks we heard about a new Decima or Ipsos Reid poll. Did releasing the findings from those polls influence apathetic or undecided voters? Was there a "he's gonna win anyway, might as well vote for him" or "he's gonna win anyway, my vote won't make a difference" mentality? Is there a chance that undecided voters are influenced because they believe "if this many people think he's the right choice, he must be the right man for the job"?
I almost think that releasing the results of the polls to the public is irresponsible, as the polls themselves may have more of an impact than anything the candidates themselves do or say. There is a lot of "jumping on the popular bandwagon" that goes on in politics, so I would love to know what would have happened if somebody had released a poll last week saying the NDP were leading at 53% of the decided vote.
So, to answer my own question, I absolutely believe that the media IS the message. The provide the information to us, and can spin it any way they want. They do it with celebrities, in the sense that they photograph or interview virtual unknown starlets and the next thing you know, because they are in every publication on the newstand they become pseudo celebrities.
Any thoughts?
I wonder how much influence the media had in determining the way the votes were cast. For example, every day for the last few weeks we heard about a new Decima or Ipsos Reid poll. Did releasing the findings from those polls influence apathetic or undecided voters? Was there a "he's gonna win anyway, might as well vote for him" or "he's gonna win anyway, my vote won't make a difference" mentality? Is there a chance that undecided voters are influenced because they believe "if this many people think he's the right choice, he must be the right man for the job"?
I almost think that releasing the results of the polls to the public is irresponsible, as the polls themselves may have more of an impact than anything the candidates themselves do or say. There is a lot of "jumping on the popular bandwagon" that goes on in politics, so I would love to know what would have happened if somebody had released a poll last week saying the NDP were leading at 53% of the decided vote.
So, to answer my own question, I absolutely believe that the media IS the message. The provide the information to us, and can spin it any way they want. They do it with celebrities, in the sense that they photograph or interview virtual unknown starlets and the next thing you know, because they are in every publication on the newstand they become pseudo celebrities.
Any thoughts?