Is point rental against the DVC policies?

[Pluto777]

It’s purposefully a little vague but at the end of the day it’s volume based. Their current look at 20 in a year is a reasonable approach.

Wouldn't a number of times an owner rented that actually INCLUDES how many points each time was rented be a more accurate measurement? Example: Lets say some owner 'A' makes 20 reservations a year, but only 50 points each. She gets flagged.
Now someone else ('B') rents only 3 reservations a year for 900 points each (1000 points vs 2700 points). 'A' will get flagged but 'B' is okay? What exactly constitutes covering your costs vs a commercial enterprise and can DVD just adjust the goal posts?

 

[disneynutz]

Disney doesn't like others making money with anything associated with Disney so if you have a website for renting or post ebay rentals or rent to others several times in a calendar year, they may start keeping track of your reservations.

Bill

 

[Dean]

Wouldn't a number of times an owner rented that actually INCLUDES how many points each time was rented be a more accurate measurement? Example: Lets say some owner 'A' makes 20 reservations a year, but only 50 points each. She gets flagged.
Now someone else ('B') rents only 3 reservations a year for 900 points each (1000 points vs 2700 points). 'A' will get flagged but 'B' is okay? What exactly constitutes covering your costs vs a commercial enterprise and can DVD just adjust the goal posts?

It would certainly be another way to approach it, not necessarily better or worse. One might be easier to track than the other but in reality the number of points one owns is gong to be the determining factor either way. One point is that the actual return is not and cannot be part of the equation. Too variable and too subjective.