Isn't abstinence, by definition, deciding to wait? What's the difference in WHY they decide to wait? If they wait, they're abstaining, nonetheless, right? As to your last point, I think most kids are smart enough to know the consequences of "not doing so" (using condoms correctly), but are at the same time not smart enough to apply what they know.[/QUOTE]hokiefan33 said:If that is what you meant, I misunderstood your point. The way it was originally worded, it sounded to me as if you meant that we don't believe in birth control, which is clearly not the case. Sorry for that misunderstanding.
BTW, it's "abstinence", not "abstainence." Anyhow, my point isn't that it's working fine, let's not do anything else, my point is that this is what we should be teaching them. The fact that it's not working well doesn't mean it's not getting taught well, it means that a lot of girls/women are choosing to ignore it and end up getting themselves in trouble.
And as to the "millions" who don't get pregnant because they were taught abstainence rather than being girls who decide to wait because that just happens to be their own unbiased choice, I'd like to see your stats on that one. Finally, if kids are allowed to be taught to use birth control correctly and taught the consequences of not doing so, I think most are smart enough to get the hang of it!
Now it's my turn. I don't think I understand your point now. Sorry. What exactly do you think should be taught to our kids along with abstinence? (thanks for the spelling lesson btw
It bothers me sometimes also, although I've never actually corrected someone). My last point was that I don't believe a girl that decides to wait necessarily does so because she was "taught" to. Her decision was probably already made in her own mind.
