IIRC, Disney only pays the modest sum of $1 mil per year to license Indiana Jones for the theme parks. (Not sure if that's worldwide, per park, per attraction, etc., but however you slice it it's not much in the grand scheme of things.)
So, I don't see them eliminating the stunt show without some IJ replacement in the works...particularly with the prospect of a new IJ film constantly looming.
The final decision will probably include a number of factors...is the Stunt Show theater footprint big enough for a clone of one of the rides? Do they want to put another show in that location? (Live shows are particularly expensive to operate given the very large number of CMs required.) Is it more economically feasible to use the Stunt Show site or to expand the park elsewhere?
I do think the Stunt Show's days are numbered--at least as it exists today. What we don't know is whether its lifespan can be measured in weeks, months, years or decades.
The only certainty at this point is that a CM rumor plus a 2-year-old unconfirmed report on a fan website does not mean this thing is any closer to happening.
So, I don't see them eliminating the stunt show without some IJ replacement in the works...particularly with the prospect of a new IJ film constantly looming.
The final decision will probably include a number of factors...is the Stunt Show theater footprint big enough for a clone of one of the rides? Do they want to put another show in that location? (Live shows are particularly expensive to operate given the very large number of CMs required.) Is it more economically feasible to use the Stunt Show site or to expand the park elsewhere?
I do think the Stunt Show's days are numbered--at least as it exists today. What we don't know is whether its lifespan can be measured in weeks, months, years or decades.

The only certainty at this point is that a CM rumor plus a 2-year-old unconfirmed report on a fan website does not mean this thing is any closer to happening.