- Joined
- Mar 23, 2004
- Messages
- 20,360
Which is less than 10% of the total number.I looked it up, its 33. Yea demand aint why its hard to get, its supply.
However, if they continue not to sell, they will continue to not be available.
Which is less than 10% of the total number.I looked it up, its 33. Yea demand aint why its hard to get, its supply.
...excepting Disney, of course.
2. Makes DVC a product above the game level of other timeshare resorts.
Inside information on this one? Point requirements have to be lowered when you can't go through the points. You can get a week in a studio for under 130 points. Its why now seemingly right around 150 points is where many contracts land (studio for a week number of points).Thus they had to lower the minimum point purchase
Elite buyers are writing this off not looking at a vacation as an investment.Elite buyers are much more likely to look at the investment side of purchases, and higher resale supports a better investment. So no, I don’t necessarily agree that restrictions will pay off for Disney.
Disagree. Those with elite money always look at the investment side of a purchase.Its already above everyone else in that there is zero alternative to WDW annually.
Meanwhile you essentially wont find a timeshare product elsewhere in the world that you can't easily find alternatives for. As an example get a timeshare in Ski country there likely is a bunch of time shares and a bunch of hotels and a bunch of Airbnbs all fighting for you. With WDW you go to Disney or you go to Disney for those rooms. Sure a tiny amount of Marriot rooms but thats a drop in the bucket.
Inside information on this one? Point requirements have to be lowered when you can't go through the points. You can get a week in a studio for under 130 points. Its why now seemingly right around 150 points is where many contracts land (studio for a week number of points).
Elite buyers are writing this off not looking at a vacation as an investment.
Disagree. Those with elite money always look at the investment side of a purchase.
Agree. Nothing is 100%Not always.
Sheesh. I am apparently not well-off enough to even know what this term meant until I googled it.A family friend of mine is a serial entrepreneur, and has been a CFO for three different companies that had successful exits. He is not quite post-economic, but he does not want for anything. His family goes to WDW probably two or three times per year, and has for close to a couple of decades now. They pretty much always stay at higher-end resorts at WDW, though he also likes the Swan Reserve a lot.
I've tried to explain DVC to him a couple of different times now. His reaction? Too complicated. He'd rather just pay for what he wants when he wants it. One of his kids was in CP and is now a full-time CM, so presumably he gets good enough deals through them!
For most of the other not-quite-post-economic people I know (and I know a few): Disney is far too pedestrian for them, and they'd rather not rub shoulders with the hoi polloi in a theme park.
Personally, I love that the Cabins are in the DVC program. We will have our 5th stay in them in a month or so and can't wait. It seems as though many in the program agree with this as they are very hard to get unless you are right on it at 7-months.
Sales, you cant get in because theres like 10 cabins declared, so I dont think the demand is super high being the reason for harder availability.
Honestly, if I had that much money, I wouldn't buy DVC, either. I'd stay somewhere with turn down service, room service, etc. I'd like DCL level service at the hotel level.A family friend of mine is a serial entrepreneur, and has been a CFO for three different companies that had successful exits. He is not quite post-economic, but he does not want for anything. His family goes to WDW probably two or three times per year, and has for close to a couple of decades now. They pretty much always stay at higher-end resorts at WDW, though he also likes the Swan Reserve a lot.
I've tried to explain DVC to him a couple of different times now. His reaction? Too complicated. He'd rather just pay for what he wants when he wants it. One of his kids was in CP and is now a full-time CM, so presumably he gets good enough deals through them!
For most of the other not-quite-post-economic people I know (and I know a few): Disney is far too pedestrian for them, and they'd rather not rub shoulders with the hoi polloi in a theme park.
I’m post-ergonomic, does that count?Sheesh. I am apparently not well-off enough to even know what this term meant until I googled it.