Impeach Bush

[julia & nicks mom]

If you have never hit anyone, or do not intend to then don't say that you would. It sounds irrational, and I can't imagine anyone advocating violence when someone doesn't share your opinion.

Medication does wonders for that type of syndrome. I have done tons of volunteer work, what have you done?

Suddenly because we don't think that the President is completely too blame for this - we are apathetic, fat, lazy and don't do volunteer who volunteer work and enjoy watching people die?

Who is the one turning this personal?

 

[minniepumpernickel]

Suddenly because we don't think that the President is completely too blame for this - we are apathetic, fat, lazy and don't do volunteer who volunteer work and enjoy watching people die?

Who is the one turning this personal?

I never said that he is 100% to blame. It's just not right to advocate violence no matter what. Surely you can understand that!

 

[minniepumpernickel]

It had nothing to do with criticizing the President, it had to do with you saying that people that don't agree with you "get off" on seeing dead people.

You can try to run from that statement all you want, but they are your words and you own them.

Well Buck, Pixie was tired of hearing us complain. so I am extrapolating that he/she would rather watch the TV coverage of the dead people and not complain.

It is your choice after all: You can let them "eat cake" all you want. Like Mary Antoinette said.

What are your thoughts, Buck? I haven't been able to read all of your posts.

 

[ThAnswr]

A misdemeanor involves breaking the law. Thus, the President would have to break the law (or be accused of breaking it) for impeachment proceedings to begin.

Define misdemeanors as the Founding Fathers defined misdemeanors.

No offense, Jrydberg, I love you dearly, but I'll take Alexander Hamilton's definition over yours.

 

[BuckNaked]

What are your thoughts, Buck? I haven't been able to read all of your posts.

If you're interested in what I have to say, take the time to read my posts.

 

[BalooTheBear]

Add
- Iran
- Soaring Interest rates
- Even/Odd Gas Rationing
- 3 Mile Island (where was he when this was going on)
- Foreign Policy
- Rising Unemployment
- Inflation/Recession[/QUOTE

You are correct. Especially about Iran. Good thing Reagan came in so he could throw our support (and biological weapons) to SADDAM in his war with IRAN. That turned out real well. And yes, everything is absolutely perfect now

~Rose~

<< Never said everything was perfect, you asked for things that Carter did that did not set well with the public....

 

[dcentity2000]

If you're interested in what I have to say, take the time to read my posts.

It's behind you Brenda! Let's move on!



Rich::

 

[BuckNaked]

Define misdemeanors as the Founding Fathers defined misdemeanors.

No offense, Jrydberg, I love you dearly, but I'll take Alexander Hamilton's definition over yours.

I thought that Constitution was a living document whose meaning and definitions change over time? Or does that only apply when it suits your (collective "your") agenda at the time?

 

[BuckNaked]

It's behind you Brenda! Let's move on!



Rich::

I'm not Cliff Notes. If she wants to know what my opinions are, they're out there in black and white.

 

[minniepumpernickel]

If you're interested in what I have to say, take the time to read my posts.

Well yes I am very much so! I have to get ready for class, if this one is still going I'll have them read by tomorrow!

 

[jrydberg]

Define misdemeanors as the Founding Fathers defined misdemeanors.

No offense, Jrydberg, I love you dearly, but I'll take Alexander Hamilton's definition over yours.

Haven't looked over the Federalist Papers in a few years, so I have to ask... did Hamilton define misdemeanors differently or did he define impeachment differently? If it's the latter, then the Constitution doesn't have Hamilton's version in there. If it's the former, you've got a stronger argument.

 

[Mickey's Monkey]

Add
- Iran
- Soaring Interest rates
- Even/Odd Gas Rationing
- 3 Mile Island (where was he when this was going on)
- Foreign Policy
- Rising Unemployment
- Inflation/Recession[/QUOTE

You are correct. Especially about Iran. Good thing Reagan came in so he could throw our support (and biological weapons) to SADDAM in his war with IRAN. That turned out real well. And yes, everything is absolutely perfect now

~Rose~

Let's see. Bush is incompetent. Bush is an idiot. Bush is a moron. Yet the Dems have had 6 years to try to defeat him. Remind me again who the incompetent ones are?

 

[wvrevy]

Let's see. Bush is incompetent. Bush is an idiot. Bush is a moron. Yet the Dems have had 6 years to try to defeat him. Remind me again who the incompetent ones are?

So he runs well in elections ? That makes him competant in his job ?

 

[ThAnswr]

If you're interested in what I have to say, take the time to read my posts.

Hmmmm..........interesting scenario.

 

[ThAnswr]

Let's see. Bush is incompetent. Bush is an idiot. Bush is a moron. Yet the Dems have had 6 years to try to defeat him. Remind me again who the incompetent ones are?

Hey, Dmadman, you're starting to show your hand a little bit too much. You wouldn't want to get booted off for another reincarnation.

 

[Mickey's Monkey]

Well you people that get off on seeing dead bodies on the side of the road piss me off too! Open your eyes, man/lady, I'm not making this stuff up!

Did it happen to be 4:20 when you wrote this? Okay.. time to put down the bong and start thinking rationally. I think you got some bad bammer there.

 

[Mai Ku Tiki]

Let's see. Bush is incompetent. Bush is an idiot. Bush is a moron. Yet the Dems have had 6 years to try to defeat him. Remind me again who the incompetent ones are?

Aloha!

Maybe the electorate could take more PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for educating themselves in-depth about this participatory democracy we are blessed with and the complicated issues confronting us instead of relying on limited, biased news sources and 30-second sound-bites, and we would then elect more effective leaders.

I don't beliieve anyone is saying ANY president is perfect...but EVERY PRESIDENT is responsible for his own decisions and actions...Republican, Democrat, ANY PRESIDENT. For the record, I PERSONALLY have always held every President-ANY PRESIDENT-accountable...That's why they are THE PRESIDENT! That's why we have elections and get to hire and fire these people! That's why we don't have KINGS! Why only THIS president should be protected from ALL responsibilty is beyond me..and usually from the same people who complain about a LACK OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY among average Americans

~Rose~

 

[ThAnswr]

Haven't looked over the Federalist Papers in a few years, so I have to ask... did Hamilton define misdemeanors differently or did he define impeachment differently? If it's the latter, then the Constitution doesn't have Hamilton's version in there. If it's the former, you've got a stronger argument.

No one has actually defined "misdemeanors" and it is very much open to interpretation. However, you are right, Hamilton did define one of the grounds for impeachment as violation of the public trust.

 

[lillygator]

I don't care what the local government has screwed up, our federal government is leaving all those people without water, food and medicine. People are dying and being left in the streets. Tell me how we could letting those people suffer and die like that.

and your whining and complaining is doing lots to help....if it bothers you so, get off your duff and do something constructive rather than writing nasty posts all night.

 

[lenshanem]

and your whining and complaining is doing lots to help....if it bothers you so, get off your duff and do something constructive rather than writing nasty posts all night.

I don't care what the local government has screwed up, our federal government is leaving all those people without water, food and medicine. People are dying and being left in the streets. Tell me how we could letting those people suffer and die like that.

How is that nasty? It is the truth.