Walt Disney built Disneyland as statement against Coney Island-type parks. Disney rides are traditionally original - not off-the-shelf carnival rides like Maliboomer. Was it fun? Yes. Did it belong at a Disney park? IMO no, no, no. Walt Disney would never allowed it. The more Disney can transform Paradise Pier away from the cheap carnival atmosphere the more it will succeed.Outside of Screamin, it was the only thrill ride at the parks. I thought it added to the "Coney Island" feel they were going for at PPier. I for one will miss it.
Walt Disney built Disneyland as statement against Coney Island-type parks. Disney rides are traditionally original - not off-the-shelf carnival rides like Maliboomer. Was it fun? Yes. Did it belong at a Disney park? IMO no, no, no. Walt Disney would never allowed it. The more Disney can transform Paradise Pier away from the cheap carnival atmosphere the more it will succeed.
See Disney Lowering the Boom on Maliboomer
Yeah, it was fun for a quick thrill with a generally short line but I am happy to see them transforming that area into something Disney worthy. Frankly, I'd like to see them do the same thing in Dinioland USA in Animal Kingdom (Dinosaur is the exception). That whole area is so cheap comared to the rest of AK which is so well themed. Maybe they'll follow suit and lose the carnival atmosphere there too.
I agree
That was also the only ride in DLR that I did not like at all!
Glad to see it go![]()
You are so right!Frankly, I'd like to see them do the same thing in Dinioland USA in Animal Kingdom (Dinosaur is the exception). That whole area is so cheap comared to the rest of AK which is so well themed. Maybe they'll follow suit and lose the carnival atmosphere there too.
the only thrill ride? what is tower of terror then?
Yep! A garden!So does anyone know what they are replacing the Maliboomer with? Thanks!