Quite the little fun in here
I found this one little intriguing imply that made me stop by: did jackson need to shag children to have the right to donate to charities?
he had to have some dark secrets to throw free money like that, didn't he? he must have liked kids since he was one himself, *** i remember him donating his own part of concert tours with the Jackson 5. Wait, he must have anticipated "slumber parties" with young boys later in his life. Sorry
As non-judgmental as i try to be in my own passing of time, may i point out something to ya folks, since the word "pedophile" caught my eye a few times.
Gavin Arvizo, poor little cancer-cured, later-accuser boy - if he's not lying, how come he couldn't remember loosing any semen? he was 13... be serious.. 13 yr olds nowadays are far from innocent. How come his answer to this in court was,I can not recall? Dudes, No one forgets having an orgasm, male or female.. Especially if its a finished one
See, the problem with the help and practical concern Michael Jackson demonstrated wasnt his intentions or actions but how he, himself, was perceived. People like you found, and still find it difficult to believe that someone who had everything could be innocent. And by the time the media had distorted the hearsay-heavy allegations into sordid sensationalism, no-one was paying attention to the fact there was no substantive basis to the accusations. Funny how you tend to believe proven liars and sociopaths (the case of the two infamous accusers) instead of the singular artist who brought your country forward and was found not guilty in the court of law. But wait.. he is so weird. He took plastic surgery, for Christ's sake! what bout Bubbles - he must have been a silenced witness.
What can i say - America. Ya gotta love it
Frank, don't you go pulling the race card out!
Keep working at it.
