With
DCL, when you travel makes a huge difference. For example, before knowing about Princess' environmental problems in Alaska, we recently booked a cruise on their line. To get a room that is about the equivalent to the DCL verandah, you have to get the mini-suite on Princess. Otherwise, you don't have the little couch on the side of the bed, which is really important to my wife for comfort. So that is what we booked. It was non-club level too. But then I started looking at DCL as an option, and found that if we sailed the same week, it was slightly
less expensive on DCL. The same room just a couple weeks prior is nearly $3,000 more on DCL. We canceled Princess and are now looking at DCL or Cunard.
In other words, if you can sail when the kids are in school, it makes a huge difference, and DCL might not even be the most expensive option for comparable rooms. I get not everyone can do that, as this option is just opening to my wife and me now that the kiddos are headed off to college and we are going to do more traveling without them. But man, it sure seems like a bargain to start traveling with two people instead of four!
Edit: I just priced NCL Encore for the same time period, and it is about $300 less than DCL for a club-level verandah. It seems mostly comparable to what you would get from a Disney veranda, plus a few modest perks. But it certainly isn't the huge savings many assume you always get. I don't think the ship is what we are looking for for this trip, but it looks great for families looking for a variety of activities and eating options on board, and I like that it ports from Seattle for travel convenience. Looks like a fun cruise!