Did you ever stop and consider that he's being so pleasant and cooperative because he KNOWS that you're going to settle for far less than you're entitled to? (More importantly, what YOUR CHILDREN are entitled to.)
Did you ever stop and consider that he's being so pleasant and cooperative because he KNOWS that you're going to settle for far less than you're entitled to? (More importantly, what YOUR CHILDREN are entitled to.)
Did you ever stop and consider that he's being so pleasant and cooperative because he KNOWS that you're going to settle for far less than you're entitled to? (More importantly, what YOUR CHILDREN are entitled to.)

I'm so sorry you're going through this. I've been in your situation and I know that panicky desperation to keep the status quo even though it was awful.
again to you. I am so sorry you have to go through this. Please know you can always come here for support or PM if you need to talk. I wish you the best.Am I entitled to more than half? That's what we've talked about. I would get the proceeds of the house and part of the retirement that together would equal half of all the assets put together. We each keep our car. We would split the cash in the savings account in half. The budget we've talked about, but haven't finalized, splits his take home pay 45% for me and 55% for him. He would continue paying his student loans and his car payment. This arrangement would allow me to only work part time and be able to be at home with my kids after school.
Am I wrong in thinking that this is very fair? Please correct me if I am.

Am I entitled to more than half? That's what we've talked about. I would get the proceeds of the house and part of the retirement that together would equal half of all the assets put together. We each keep our car. We would split the cash in the savings account in half. The budget we've talked about, but haven't finalized, splits his take home pay 45% for me and 55% for him. He would continue paying his student loans and his car payment. This arrangement would allow me to only work part time and be able to be at home with my kids after school.
Am I wrong in thinking that this is very fair? Please correct me if I am.
It's easy enought to split current assets. But the future is very different. What happens to your 45% if your husband decides to stop practicing law and become a 2nd grade teacher 5 years from now? What happens if he remarries and his new wife resents the loss of her income and takes it out on your kids? Who pays for college, for summer camp, for the swimming pool membership, for afterschool activities??? How will you split the holidays - do you want your kids leaving Christmas day at noon and not seeing them until the day before school starts?
There are a million details involved, and a wise person gets the advice of a lawyer. You don't have to get the lawyer involved with your husband - but you should be in his or her office and talk through everything, just so you will have the benefit of someone else's experience. For every piece of advice you get in a lawyers's office or on this thread, you can be sure at least 100 women learned the hard and painful way that it was necessary.
Please just talk to a lawyer.
Yes I am and I never thought I'd go back to work, even when my kids both get to school. I haven't worked for over 6 years - I don't even know if could write a resume. I honestly don't remember exactly what I did at my previous jobs. I am so rusty I would probably have to take a class or something before I could start working. Like I said, I don't even want to be an accountant again. I only did it before because I was reasonably good at it, it was fairly easy to find a job and it paid well enough to put my husband through law school.

The point is, a lawyer can tell you if your husband is truly offering "half" of everything. You helped put him through law school, so depending on his type of law practice, if he's a partner, sole practitioner, associate, etc., there is the value of a law practice to be considered. That is an asset that I'm sure your husband hasn't included in this split.Am I entitled to more than half? That's what we've talked about. I would get the proceeds of the house and part of the retirement that together would equal half of all the assets put together. We each keep our car. We would split the cash in the savings account in half. The budget we've talked about, but haven't finalized, splits his take home pay 45% for me and 55% for him. He would continue paying his student loans and his car payment. This arrangement would allow me to only work part time and be able to be at home with my kids after school.
Am I wrong in thinking that this is very fair? Please correct me if I am.
Dana brought up a VERY good point here.He knows he's probably going to wind up paying your attorney or a least part of his fees, therefore, he will manipulate to keep you from hiring one.
It's easy enought to split current assets. But the future is very different. What happens to your 45% if your husband decides to stop practicing law and become a 2nd grade teacher 5 years from now? What happens if he remarries and his new wife resents the loss of her income and takes it out on your kids? Who pays for college, for summer camp, for the swimming pool membership, for afterschool activities??? How will you split the holidays - do you want your kids leaving Christmas day at noon and not seeing them until the day before school starts?
There are a million details involved, and a wise person gets the advice of a lawyer. You don't have to get the lawyer involved with your husband - but you should be in his or her office and talk through everything, just so you will have the benefit of someone else's experience. For every piece of advice you get in a lawyers's office or on this thread, you can be sure at least 100 women learned the hard and painful way that it was necessary.
Please just talk to a lawyer.
All the goodwill in the world can go out the window when new blended families are created and generate new financial priorities... you won't just be dealing with ex-DH
... while the ex-DH is now on wife number 3
I absolutely agree with keeping things amicable between you for everyone's sake... BUT... as a lawyer himself he should not feel threatened or upset but actually understand that you want to have at least a mediator or your own attorney. I would be very suspicious if he said otherwise. Why would he want to control this and make you dependent on HIS interpretation of how things should be?
As many people here who have walked in your shoes can say from experience, it's a very, very tough thing to go through... hang in and take it a day at a time... better days are defintely ahead