Here are a few of mine. What is it for you that will change this year for getting good shots?
The Equipment
Here are a few of mine. What is it for you that will change this year for getting good shots?
The Equipment
Are you going to leave us in suspense?![]()
What were you using and what are you now using?

And, as every red blooded male knows, you always need a good wingman!!!![]()

One interesting shot that I've never seen of this parade is a very long exposure shot. It would be fun to take some shots with the camera on a tripod that last 5 to 20 seconds. The lights on the parade would make an interesting abstract pattern.
Regardless, it's definitely something that takes a bit of practice and experimenting. I've seen a lot of Spectro shots on here and honestly, very, very few of them are really what I would consider "great" shots (no offense to anyone!) - and yes, I most definitely feel the same way about my own shots! Even if they turn out well on a technical level (and that's tough enough, no matter what equipment you have), they are very rarely interesting photos. That may be one of my challenges for my next trip, try to come up with a way to make a few really interesting photos of things that are difficult to shoot at all. I'll probably fail miserably, but what the heck.![]()
I too want to really look at how to get a DIFFERENT shot during spectromagic, more than I want to get a "correct" shot of the same old same old.
Exactly what I'm thinking.Spectro also has the challenge of finding a position that allows some variety in perspective. One thing I think makes it hard is being generally "stuck" at a single distance unless you want to run out onto mainstreet.I too want to really look at how to get a DIFFERENT shot during spectromagic, more than I want to get a "correct" shot of the same old same old.
Exactly what I'm thinking.Myself, I've never seen the parade anywhere but on Main St, and then usually by the loop by the train station. Another location may work better, I think one thing that may be interesting, too, is a high-focal-length shot, which is only really possible from a few locations. The downside to that is I'd want a very fast lens like that, and my fastest/longest lens is my 50mm F1.4. I'd love an 85mm F1.4 but they go for big money used, and the 77mm F1.8 is very nice but I just haven't justified that purchase yet.
I did almost convince myself to pick up a Jupiter 9 a couple days ago, which is a Russian-made 85mm F2.0 that's a Zeiss copy, but just couldn't justify it!
I dunno, that's still a good-sized chunk of money that I'd hate to part with for only a short-term use of a lens. I have no doubt that I'd want one, but I've never been one to rent instead of buy. (You should see my DVD collection - in the early days, I had more than most stores did.Cameralensrentals.com rents Pentax lenses. They have the 77mm f/1.8 in their lineup. $96 for 3 weeks. $70 for 2 weeks. They also have the 100mm f/2.8 for $57 for 3 weeks.
Something to think about.
) The 100mm doesn't interest me as it's a macro lens and I already have my 105mm macro, it's manual focus but that's fine for macro and it's probably a better overall lens. No doubt the OEM one is great but the Kiron-built 105mm 1:1 macro lens like I've got is one of the finest macros ever by most accounts. Fortunately I got mine before word really got out and prices quickly doubled on them!