surferdave
Not hero DIS deserves, but the hero DIS needs righ
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Messages
- 2,600
The problems may lie within MM+, but since the MB is the conduit for us to utilize everything linked to MM+, this board can absolutely capture the info. If the MB doesn't work for something that it should, it means there was an issue with MM+. Hence, if someone says their MB failed 20 times & lists when, that gives an idea of where MM+ failed. And if someone says their band never had a problem, that means MM+ was a success for them. I don't think anyone is arguing the bands themselves are the problem, but they are the "symptom" by which we can diagnose the disease.
If you just want to know the raw number of MM+ faults that show up as Magic Bands are scanned, maybe so (many of the faults do not, like a dining reservation being lost). But the OP seemed to be trying to determine some percentage of faults per scan on bands, maybe seeking reassurance that failures are rare. But I don't think this helps many people by itself. What would really help would be knowing when things do fail for someone what sorts of data they may have been putting through the system (resort reservations, number of guests linked, dining) that could have contributed to the data corruption.
It's likely that people who have the highest MB scan throughput numbers are AP holders who have less complicated MM+ profiles (with lots of FP+ data but less in the way of resort, dining, photography, transportation and such). They probably have a lower chance of data corruption per scan than infrequent travelers who hit WDW less than once per year and have a lot more data spread across the system.
That would mean that season ticket holders who go a lot and tell the rest of us here that it works great aren't as likely to experience problems as the vacationers from out of state who are eager for such news.