FlightlessDuck
Y kant Donald fly?
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2006
- Messages
- 21,800
2. One of each. I collected them all!
You say it was hard going from 2 to 3, can you tell me what made it be the hardest transition. Thanks
One. Yes, JUST one. And yes, it was 100%, absolutely, completely on purpose.I never, ever wanted more than one child. DS is very happy to be the only one, and I think it makes him even happier to know that we never intended for there to be more.
I find it insulting that magazine articles about families often choose ONLY to highlight families with one child from the perspective of it being a HORRIBLE tragedy that befell them. I know I am not the only person in the world who purposely has one child. I chose to have an only child, I didn't "settle" for having an only.



Thirteen.![]()
DD 20 DS 19 DD 17 DD 17 DD 15 DS 14 DD 13 DD 11 DS 9 DS 8 DD 6 DD 4 and the baby DD who is 2.
I think for me it was getting used to having two hands and three kids. Age probably made a big difference as well, my oldest three are close together so I had a 3yo, 2yo and a newborn at the same time. Things like going to the grocery store were really stressful for me until I figured out what worked. I never had anyone to help me so I had to learn how to handle them by myself (DH was in the Army and gone alot). So by the time number four came along I had my systems down, I knew how to handle more than 2 kids so it really seemed like no big deal. Plus I was confident enough in my parenting that I didn't worry over every little thing with the baby, I knew what was normal, and I also knew that it was okay if I had to lay the baby down in a safe place and let him cry for a couple minutes so I could tend to someone else he really would be fine. With number three I had tried to do it all, keep the baby happy, keep the older kids happy (heaven forbid they should have to wait 5 minutes for a cup of milk!), but by number four I relaxed.
Thirteen.![]()
DD 20 DS 19 DD 17 DD 17 DD 15 DS 14 DD 13 DD 11 DS 9 DS 8 DD 6 DD 4 and the baby DD who is 2.
