1) Yep.
2) We (and I) have done that.
3) Our managers held an UNOFFICIAL meeting to discuss this with us and other CM's.
3) Double-booking has gotten way out of hand.
4) People cannot make 90-day ressies because others take them.
5) It seems like a good compromise.
This raises a lot of questions.
You delete ALL ADR's for an entire trip if you notice a "double booking"?
When exactly does this deletion happen? Do you just pull up random records by phone number or resort reservation when you're not on a call? Or do you notice them when somebody calls in to make a new reservation? If it's the latter, what do you exactly?
I get that double bookings are bad, and inconsiderate and all that. But there's got to be a better way from a customer service perspective than letting guest *make* "double bookings" and then having them find out when they arrive that ALL their ADR's for the entire trip have been cancelled.
I'd really like to understand what constitutes a "double booking."
If I book a restaurant A for lunch at Noon, and restaurant B at 4:00pm on the same day (let's say I can't get a "real" dinner reservation for favorite restaurant B). Is that a double booking?
If I'm travelling with a small group, let's say Grandma, Grandpa, me, my wife, and my daughter. If I make a dinner reservation for Chef Mickey's for 2 adults and one child for the same day I make a dinner reservation for 2 adults at The Wave, is that a double booking?
How about if my hotel reservation is for the 3 of us (me, wife and daughter), but if we want to split up and dine with friends that aren't on the hotel reservation with us? (i.e. two different restaurants for dinner on the same night with 3 or more guests each)
I think the argument that people can't make reservations at 90 days because of double bookings may be a bit of a red herring. So long as people cancel their doubles a reasonable amount of time before arrival, *somebody* will get that reservation. This is effectively shifting the reservation model from a first-come-first-served model to a lottery model. And I'm not so sure that's a bad thing. I'd argue the the first-come-first-served model is a bit unfair to people on the West Coast or people who get a less experienced cast member who doesn't understand "Cindy's, September 1st, 9am, party of 3" right away. (I'm probably misremembering what I had to bark back in our CRT days, but you know what I mean, and I have no idea if that's still necessary....)
If you need a way to prevent double booking altogether, or a way to ensure that people only hold "doubles" for a brief period of time, there are better ways than scare tactics. (Which, I might add, really only work on people that read DISboards.)
Brett