ZIPBAGS said:
I know its like a million dollars per mile. But, with the cost of gas and how much those buses must use. It might become more feasible.
Also, what expansion of the monorail is the most feasable?
That figure was quoted back when they were figuring the cost to build a monorail link to/from the Orlando Int'l. AIRPORT.
It is that high because of the LAND costs to buy/rent the rights-of-way on other owners' property.
It would not cost a "Million dollars a mile" (one-way or two way) to construct ON Disney property. It is far from "High-Tech" as the design of the tracks is 1960's technology, and rather easy to pre-fab.
The biggest deterrent to building monorails to all resorts and theme-parks is the huge amount of TERMINAL SPACE it would require.
Look how big TTC is with just the THREE monorails there.
How big whould if need to be to handle two, to ten more trains at the same junction?
And there WOULD need to be a central junction, as there would be NO WAY to send multiple monorails (at least the kind they are using NOW) to multiple parks (individually).
Now, imagine what TTC would look like will virtually ALL guests from 4 theme-parks and X number of resorts "changing trains" going to/from parks/resorts/parking lots at or near opening or closing times... even if the times were "staggered". (YIKES!)
AND...
There would STILL be the need for X number of buses going to/from at least some of the resorts... and for "back-up" should there be a problem with the monorail(s) or the track(s).
With WDW as large and varied as it has become... a conventional monorail system (as they have now) would not be very PRACTICAL on a larger scale, even if its cost to build was lower.
OTOH, there was talk for awhile last decade of using a DIIFERENT KIND of monorail system at WDW with much smaller cars that could be more easily "re-routed" on the tracks (think of the cars as rather large "traveling elevators") as needs changed throughout the day. This system is still closer to being "experimental". Another flaw with this system is it would not be able handle a substantial of people per car at any given time, so it would require MANY cars... and there could be significant safety issues with more and more cars operating at once.