One of the complain I have seen mention onthe thread is that eatin healthy is more expensive... Good health has no price !!!
Of course. I took those statements, though, not so much as saying that eating healthfully wasn't worth it (pardon the double-negative), but rather that some folks actually didn't have the financial resources to be able to eat as healthfully as they perhaps should. I know my wife was in that situation for many years before we were married. She didn't
devalue eating healthfully, but just couldn't afford it.
For those who complain about the price of eating healty , two little thoughts: with the price of doctors in the states , you could actually be saving some money by heating healthy !
And here's where controversy starts: Who pays for the food? Who pays for the doctor? In the United States, in many cases, the answers are not the same.
Poly Cystic Ovarian Syndrome? This is quite common in a lot of women
There is no question that PCOS is a major contributor to obesity. However, it is important to point out that many women with PCOS do successfully manage to maintain a healthy weight, and are fit. Also, remember that only about 5% of women suffer from PCOS (depending on the research -- this number comes from research presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society). I have seen a lot of folks online (not on
this board, of course <grin>)
assume that they have PCOS without consulting a physician: I caution against that on
two counts: (1) chances are you don't have PCOS, and (2) if you do, you need a doctor to get it treated.
don't believe it for a minute, but I guess you're officially a part of the obesity epidemic that's sweeping the country and alarming the world. [I think the chart is wrong.]
Most of the charts out there
are wrong: They actually are using old information. However, the later research indicated that the healthy weight ranges are actually
lower than they used to be. Ten years ago I was supposedly healthy below 175... now I'm healthy only below 170. Furthermore, recent research indicates clearly that even the
new healthy weight ranges are actually
higher than they should be, if the balance between day-to-day health and longevity was shifted a bit in favor of longevity. People who are
below the healthy weight ranges live longer than those above the range
or even in the range.
I'm not in my healthy weight range right now. Having been there, relatively recently, I can say with assurance that I was indeed healthier then than I am now. The charts don't lie. They're reflections of our best research on what is a very complicated subject. In my weight-loss support group, we helped each other fight the obstacles to getting fit, rather than fighting the prospect of getting fit.
I imagine the population on one there looks a lot different than that of Lynn, MA, so give me a break. The people around me don't look a whole lot bigger than they ever did, collectively, but the weight standards seem to be more stringent, for sure.
Two things. First, we in Masschusetts are the healthiest people in the Northeast. We're in the top 10 nationwide. Obesity is much lower here than elsewhere around the country. Second, the standard have indeed become more stringent; as I mentioned above, that's because later research indicated that the older healthy weight ranges were too high. The older ranges were based on actuarial tables that were related to a certain financial risk appetite on the part of insurers. The newer ranges are based to a greater extent on health.
I think a few people are joining the thread late and missed the point of the original topic.
Well, of course, these discussions tend to branch out as they go along.
aren't there just some people who are born to be fat?
I mentioned before that we're all born to be fat. I believe the issue here is what to do to avoid the inevitable obesity.