PlutoLuvr
KORT RORP/ERS AULS TKPWET T LA*S WORD :)
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2006
- Messages
- 1,555
Really the only time I can recall the FOTL being longer or the same as the regular lines have been situations where the parks are crazy slow, but the hotels are packed. I can remember two trips -- evacuations, actually -- to USO during Septembers when hurricanes were going mad all over the state. Mid to late September is about the slowest time of year to go to Orlando theme parks, but the hotels were sold out due to evacuations and really the only lines for rides were in the FOTL queues. Nothing drastic, but like 10 minutes for the regular line on Jaws and 10 minutes for the FOTL line on the same ride.
Very strange trips, to say the least. The parks (and FOTL queues) were probably 90 percent FL resident evacuees. Very hard to enjoy yourself when you're wondering if your home will still be standing in the next day or two. And there were so many of us together in the same lines. And to happen two years back to back is uber strange.
The hypothesizing about what the new hotel will be like and whether it will offer FOTL is an interesting discussion and not too far off topic, IMHO. I mean, if USO is overextending itself in the EP department, a new onsite hotel, as well as the upcoming crowds for the HP island will no doubt have an effect on EP in its current state.
DH & I were talking about it last night, and we'd be up for a value hotel. It would mean a lot more visits on site for us. There are so many factors! We're only a quick two-hour drive away, and most of our Orlando trips are long weekends, anyway. We never go during busy seasons, so FOTL, while it's nice to have, isn't usually necessary for the times we go. A big factor for us is what you see in my avatar. And I can't drink two or three of them and hope to drive offsite to my hotel or timeshare, so we have to factor in cab costs. A value hotel onsite would be a notch in the "con" column for FOTL purposes, but it would be a big notch in the "pro" column for onsite partying purposes and at a modest price -- something USO doesn't have currently.
Like others have mentioned, we REALLY hope they don't do away with FOTL and institute some kind of EMH system instead. Blech! We're sleeping in the mornings and we're off eating, drinking and enjoying nightlife in the evenings. Plus, the times we go are positively dead and the parks are practically empty anyway. I can't imagine it would be cost effective to keep all those employees working for just a few hotel guests.
It shall be interesting to see it all unfold!
Very strange trips, to say the least. The parks (and FOTL queues) were probably 90 percent FL resident evacuees. Very hard to enjoy yourself when you're wondering if your home will still be standing in the next day or two. And there were so many of us together in the same lines. And to happen two years back to back is uber strange.
The hypothesizing about what the new hotel will be like and whether it will offer FOTL is an interesting discussion and not too far off topic, IMHO. I mean, if USO is overextending itself in the EP department, a new onsite hotel, as well as the upcoming crowds for the HP island will no doubt have an effect on EP in its current state.
DH & I were talking about it last night, and we'd be up for a value hotel. It would mean a lot more visits on site for us. There are so many factors! We're only a quick two-hour drive away, and most of our Orlando trips are long weekends, anyway. We never go during busy seasons, so FOTL, while it's nice to have, isn't usually necessary for the times we go. A big factor for us is what you see in my avatar. And I can't drink two or three of them and hope to drive offsite to my hotel or timeshare, so we have to factor in cab costs. A value hotel onsite would be a notch in the "con" column for FOTL purposes, but it would be a big notch in the "pro" column for onsite partying purposes and at a modest price -- something USO doesn't have currently.
Like others have mentioned, we REALLY hope they don't do away with FOTL and institute some kind of EMH system instead. Blech! We're sleeping in the mornings and we're off eating, drinking and enjoying nightlife in the evenings. Plus, the times we go are positively dead and the parks are practically empty anyway. I can't imagine it would be cost effective to keep all those employees working for just a few hotel guests.
It shall be interesting to see it all unfold!