Is three to four hours per day a good start for pre-school/kindergarten? We want to make sure they get enough but we want them to be kids as well.
Thanks to everyone who posts on this thread. the info i have seen is amazing!
Placing soapbox:
I look at it this way: how many hours a day did pioneer children spend in "school" when they were 3, 4, 5, 6, 7yo? (in PA: 1895: Compulsory Education Act mandated that children between 8 and 13 years old attend school for at least four months per year) Probably not much, if any at all. They played, the followed their parents around and asked, "why?" ad nauseum. They played some more. They learned to wash the dishes and sort the clothes and pick beans and help as much as they were able. They might have learned their ABCs and to count. Important foundations that are laid in those early play/why/helper years, not learning to recite the times tables at 5yo. These children grew up to be doctors, lawyers, teachers, inventors, mechanics, ranchers, bankers, you name it. There were some pretty smart cookies some of whom may have only had 2.5 years of formal education by today's 8 month standards.
I recently read research (I'm looking to find the references) that indicated that children should NOT begin formal education until around 8 (funny correlation between the early compulsory ed laws...) years old. They are still maturing their verbal and motor skills and aren't ready for structured learning yet, either in the schools or at home. Once they hit 8 or 9 (for ADHD students, the brain matures later) they explode into their skill sets and can really assimilate the information passionately and with purpose.
My 13yo was a non-reader, non-writer, non-speller and I, the English teacher, was mortified and really struggled with it. I took her to a tutor, we had her tested, we did everything to beg this child to read. We did learn that she had a tracking problem and that was taken care of with vision therapy, but she still wasn't a reader/writer/speller. Then, BOOM. 9yo came along and suddenly, she was reading on level, she was writing, and her spelling has improved dramatically. I didn't do anything different, I just let her "grow into" her learning.
I think we spend too much time worrying what other people think about our kids and how we rear/teach them and we would be better off if we worried about it ALL a lot less. I'm not saying that they should be left to roam and be feral children (like my nieces and nephew...whole other story

), but at the same time, let them play and learn and play some more. TRAVEL with them. Take them places. Let them touch and feel and see and explore.
I spent less time in a classroom than I spent IN one growing up. No, my parents are NOT homeschoolers or even supportive of it, but I was sick a lot and they were all about travel. We lived in Germany and whenever my Dad had a long weekend, we were in our 15' camping trailer going SOMEWHERE. Maybe over to a flea market in France, maybe sledding in the Black Forest, maybe to a museum in Switzerland. Once stateside, we kept it up, museums, zoos, road trips. My folks were NEVER about "perfect attendance" and we'd go to Dallas for a few days or the Grand Canyon when it suited my Dad's work schedule. Travel is one of the reasons I chose to homeschool.
Don't sweat the hours. Don't sweat the facts. Answer the whys and let them play.
Picking up soapbox...
