- Joined
- Feb 6, 2000
- Messages
- 30,879
I better get to the polls early that day!!!!!!!!
![]()
Do you have early voting in PA? We can vote for about a week before the actual "election day" here in TX.
I better get to the polls early that day!!!!!!!!
![]()
Pa. Dems Set Enrollment Record
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) - Democratic Party enrollment surged past the 4 million mark Monday, setting a state record on the last day Pennsylvanians had to register to vote in next month's presidential primary....
....the number of Democrats increased by more than 161,000, or more than 4 percent, to at least 4,044,952. No political party in the state had previously reached the 4 million threshold.....
....Registration in the GOP declined by about 1 percent, to 3,215,478 statewide.....
....The largest percentage gains were concentrated in the Philadelphia suburbs and the state's central region, mostly in counties where Republicans still outnumber Democrats......
....Of the more than 8.2 million Pennsylvania voters, more than 120,000 are people who were not previously registered to vote......
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080325/D8VK65UG0.html
I better get to the polls early that day!!!!!!!!
![]()
Do you have early voting in PA? We can vote for about a week before the actual "electio day" here in TX.
I totally agree here - I've really never had to "hold my nose" to vote - I think that's because the primary had always been decided before I had to choose - so I had time to digest all the information about our nominee.
I really liked Gore - it was a travesty what happened to him. Had he run this time - I would have been on his team, and not Hillary's.
Obama is going to be learning on the job - and will be bound to make many mistakes in the beginning (just like Clinton & GWB did). The question is - are we at a time in history - where we can afford to recover from these mistakes?
At this point in time - unless Hillary is the VP choice - I will be voting by not voting for President.
http://www.pollster.com/[/URL] is my fave, they average ALL the polls. But nothing has been done in over a week.
We are voting on Town Librarian here!
True. His California First lady endorsement didnt help either.
Really, when was the last time you heard ANY politian endorse another polititian and said "OK now I know who to vote for!" ?![]()
I just can't bring myself to not vote and I also can't bring myself to vote for McCain. More and more, I'm thinking I'm going to vote for Hillary, even if I have to write her in. That's pretty much the only solution I can live with - at this point.
I think that Edwards' endorsement would mean something to me but only if he explained why in reasonable terms. It would at least add something else to mull over.
I'm not going to lie - Richardson SHOULD have endorsed Hillary - the Clinton administration gave him national exposure with a national position - which he turned into a successful campaign as governor - which was\is a way to enhance his resume for a potential run as president.
And now, he still insists he's loyal to the Clinton's? Please. He can endorse whoever he wants - but don't pretend you still have loyalty to the other side! Must be a new definition of loyalty!
He went with the media established front runner. And I still suspect he was promised something!
Maybe all the pollsters are on Spring Vacation!![]()
Pollsters Gone Wild!![]()
![]()
I'd be the last to say that. I know most endorsements come down to what can it do for their careers.