Really? Here are two:
He wasn't shocked that a farmer knew about Burma. He was surprised to be asked about it by a farmer, as opposed to be asked about something a little closer to home.
"SUPRISED' , "SHOCKED"...."POTATOE" "POTAHTO"!
The simple fact that Obama was SUPRISED that a farmer in IOWA knew anything about Burma, proves what a Elistist he truly is.
"Everyone supporting him is a politician"? Really? So the millions of people that have voted for him are all in politics? The 1.3 Million that have donated to his campaign are all politicians? The endorsements he's gotten from millions in trade unions across the country are all from politicians?.
Where ar ALL the REAL PEOPLE who have been helped by Obama with all his past experience?
Millions of people who voted for him ar believing a pack of lies that HE is telling him.
The trade unions that support him are run by POLITICAL people! And I do believe "millions in trade unions " is a bit of a exageration!
Yes, you lied to the woman.
NOPE! As Jack Nicholson ( another Hillary supporter) would say, "You cant handle the Truth!"
Having since fact checked it, is
is a misleading article. Factually, it's correct, but it spins things drastically in Obama's favor. That's why I posted the "little disclaimer".
Wow...more insults.

Now I remember why I stopped reading this thread. You guys have fun.
From fact check org
April 1, 2008
A widely forwarded e-mail claims that Obama's bills are more substantive and numerous than Clinton's. Don't believe it.
Summary
A misleading e-mail has been making the rounds, alleging that Clinton has fewer legislative accomplishments than Obama, and that they are less substantive. We've had questions about it from a number of readers, and blogs have jumped into the fray. So what's the real story on the Senate careers of the Democratic presidential candidates?
We find that the e-mail is false in almost every particular:
It sets up a face-off between apples and, well, broccoli, comparing only the Clinton-sponsored bills that became law with all bills sponsored or cosponsored by Obama, whether they were signed into law or not.
It includes legislation Obama sponsored in the Illinois state Senate, a very different legislative body.
It tells us that Obama has sponsored more legislation than Clinton, when in fact he has sponsored less.
It implies that Obama has passed more bills into law than Clinton, when the opposite is true.
Contrary to the e-mail's assertions, Clinton's and Obama's contributions are not qualitatively different, and quantitatively,
Clinton has the edge.
And AGIN Obama is the #3 man for MOST MISSED VOTES while being a Senator. When his he going to have is NATO hearings?????