ncmickeyluvr
<font color=darkorchid>darn. I really like being r
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Messages
- 1,733
I have to side with your husband as well, but there is a caveat.
If your DH's family also married people of English and French ancestry while living here, I don't see how that makes his blood more diluted than yours based solely on the argument of time since immigration. The caveat: Now if they married outside of their ethnicity, I would say that those nationalities would also have to be included when discussing his ethnic heritage.
I'm currently taking a genealogy certification course and hope to become a board certified genealogist. When people hear me talk about it, I usually get asked my ethnic heritage. Normally I say I'm from late 19th century immigrants of mixed European ancestry. Or that my Dad is 1/4 French Canadian, 1/4 English with possible Dutch thrown in, 1/4 Swedish and 1/4 Irish and my Mother is 1/2 French Canadian (Acadian) and 1/2 Northern Italian via the Marche region.
My point....dh's ancesters DID NOT necessarily marry people of the same nationality. The original ancester came over as a servant with no family. His children married a who's who of Eastern/ Central North Carolina.