Heads Up! Major terror alert almost certainly coming next week!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
this thread is funny
i love when the Bush people comlain about people bashing him and the republicans
the clintons had scandal it was they are ruining america blah blah they deserve it
now that we know we went to war on lie, they outted an agent, tried to cover up and there will probably be indictments
frist in under investigation and delay has been indicted its all a witch huntits just people hating on the president
cant an of you bush people EVER just admit he messed up and so did his staff
 
To the righties: The below list is taken from a blog by Keith Olberman of MSNBC's countdown. He lists thirteen instances of Bush "wagging the dog". By all means, refute them if you can. Somehow, I doubt you will though. You'll just dismiss with the usual "nuh-uh" and keep chuggin' that kool aid.

(BTW...Here is the link to the full article: The Nexus of Politics and Terror

Please, judge for yourself.

Number One:

May 18th, 2002. The first details of the President’s Daily Briefing of August 6th, 2001, are revealed, including its title - “Bin Laden Determined To Strike In U.S.” The same day another memo is discovered - revealing the FBI knew of men with links to Al Qaeda training at an Arizona flight school. The memo was never acted upon. Questions about 9/11 Intelligence failures are swirling.

May 20th, 2002. Two days later, FBI Director Mueller declares another terrorist attack “inevitable.” The next day, the Department of Homeland Security issues warnings of attacks against railroads nationwide, and against New York City landmarks like the Brooklyn Bridge and the Statue of Liberty.

Number Two:

June 6th, 2002. Colleen Rowley, the FBI agent who tried to alert her superiors to the specialized flight training taken by Zacarias Moussaoui, whose information suggests the government missed a chance to break up the 9/11 plot, testifies before Congress. Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Graham says Rowley’s testimony has inspired similar pre-9/11 whistle-blowers.

June 10th, 2002. Four days later, speaking from Russia, Attorney General John Ashcroft reveals that an American named Jose Padilla is under arrest, accused of plotting a radiation bomb attack in this country. Padilla had, by this time, already been detained for more than a month.

Number Three:

February 5th, 2003. Secretary of State Powell tells the United Nations Security Council of Iraq’s concealment of weapons, including 18 mobile biological weapons laboratories, justifying a U.N. or U.S. first strike. Many in the UN are doubtful. Months later, much of the information proves untrue.

February 7th, 2003. Two days later, as anti-war demonstrations continue to take place around the globe, Homeland Security Secretary Ridge cites “credible threats” by Al Qaeda, and raises the terror alert level to orange. Three days after that, Fire Administrator David Paulison - who would become the acting head of FEMA after the Hurricane Katrina disaster - advises Americans to stock up on plastic sheeting and duct tape to protect themselves against radiological or biological attack.

Number Four:

July 23rd, 2003: The White House admits the CIA -- months before the President's State of the Union Address -- expressed "strong doubts" about the claim that Iraq had attempted to buy uranium from Niger. On the 24th, the Congressional report on the 9/11 attacks is issued; it criticizes government at all levels; it reveals an FBI informant had been living with two of the future hijackers; and it concludes that Iraq had no link to Al-Qaeda. 28 pages of the report are redacted. On the 26th, American troops are accused of beating Iraqi prisoners.

July 29th, 2003. Three days later, amid all of those negative headlines, Homeland Security issues warnings of further terrorist attempts to use airplanes for suicide attacks.

Number Five:

December 17th, 2003. 9/11 Commission Co-Chair Thomas Kean says the attacks were preventable. The next day, a Federal Appeals Court says the government cannot detain suspected radiation-bomber Jose Padilla indefinitely without charges, and the chief U.S. Weapons inspector in Iraq, Dr. David Kay, who has previously announced he has found no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, announces he will resign his post.

December 21st, 2003. Three days later, just before Christmas, Homeland Security again raises the threat level to Orange, claiming “credible intelligence” of further plots to crash airliners into U.S. cities. Subsequently, six international flights into this country are cancelled after some passenger names purportedly produce matches on government no-fly lists. The French later identify those matched names: one belongs to an insurance salesman from Wales, another to an elderly Chinese woman, a third to a five-year old boy.

Number Six:

March 30th, 2004. The new chief weapons inspector in Iraq, Charles Duelfer tells Congress we have still not found any WMD there. And, after weeks of refusing to appear before the 9/11 Commission, Condoleezza Rice finally relents and agrees to testify. On the 31st: Four Blackwater-USA contractors working in Iraq are murdered, their mutilated bodies dragged through the streets and left on public display in Fallujah. The role of civilian contractors in Iraq is widely questioned.

April 2nd, 2004. Homeland Security issues a bulletin warning that terrorists may try to blow up buses and trains, using fertilizer and fuel bombs - like the one detonated in Oklahoma City - stuffed into satchels or duffel bags.

Number Seven:

May 16th, 2004. Secretary of State Powell appears on “Meet The Press.” Moderator Tim Russert closes by asking him about the “enormous personal credibility” Powell had placed before the U.N. in laying out a case against Saddam Hussein. An aide to Powell interrupts the question, saying the interview is over. Powell finishes his answer, admitting that much of the information he had been given about Weapons of Mass Destruction was “inaccurate and wrong, and, in some cases, deliberately misleading.”

May 21st, 2004, new photos showing mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib Prison are released. On the 24th - Associated Press video from Iraq confirms U.S. forces mistakenly bombed a wedding party - killing more than 40.

Wednesday the 26th. Two days later, Attorney General Ashcroft and FBI Director Mueller warn that intelligence from multiple sources, in Ashcroft’s words, “indicates Al-Qaeda’s specific intention to hit the United States hard,” and that “90 percent of the arrangements for an attack on the United States were complete.” The color-coded warning system is not raised, and Homeland Security Secretary Ridge does not attend the announcement.

Number Eight:

July 6th, 2004. Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry selects Senator John Edwards as his vice presidential running mate, producing a small bump in the election opinion polls, and a huge swing in media attention towards the Democratic campaign.

July 8th, 2004. Two days later, Homeland Secretary Ridge warns of information about Al-Qaeda attacks during the summer or autumn. Four days after that, the head of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, DeForest B. Soaries, Junior, confirms he has written to Ridge about the prospect of postponing the upcoming Presidential election in the event it is interrupted by terrorist acts.

Number Nine:

July 29th, 2004. At their party convention in Boston, the Democrats formally nominate John Kerry as their candidate for President. As in the wake of any convention, the Democrats dominate the media attention over the ensuing weekend.

Monday, August 1st, 2004. The Department of Homeland Security raises the alert status for financial centers in New York, New Jersey, and Washington to orange. The evidence supporting the warning - reconnaissance data, left in a home in Iraq - later proves to be roughly four years old and largely out-of-date.

Number Ten:

Last Thursday. At 10 AM Eastern Time, the President addresses the National Endowment for Democracy, once again emphasizing the importance of the war on terror and insisting his government has broken up at least 10 terrorist plots since 9/11.

At 3 PM Eastern Time, five hours after the President’s speech has begun, the Associated Press reports that Karl Rove will testify again to the CIA Leak Grand Jury, and that Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald has told Rove he cannot guarantee that he will not be indicted.

At 5:17 PM Eastern Time, seven hours after the President’s speech has begun, New York officials disclose a bomb threat to the city’s subway system - based on information supplied by the Federal Government. A Homeland Security spokesman says the intelligence upon which the disclosure is based is “of doubtful credibility.” And it later proves that New York City had known of the threat for at least three days, and had increased police presence in the subways long before making the announcement at that particular time. Local New York television station, WNBC, reports it had the story of the threat days in advance, but was asked by "high ranking federal officials" in New York and Washington to hold off its story.

Less than four days after revealing the threat, Mayor Michael Bloomberg says "Since the period of the threat now seems to be passing, I think over the immediate future, we'll slowly be winding down the enhanced security."

While news organizations ranging from the New York Post to NBC News quote sources who say there was reason to believe that informant who triggered the warning simply ‘made it up’, a Senior U.S. Counter-terrorism official tells the New York Times: "There was no there, there."

The list of three additional examples follows.

Number Eleven:

October 22nd, 2004. After weeks of Administration insistence that there are terrorist plans to disrupt the elections, FBI, Law Enforcement, and other U.S. Intelligence agencies report they have found no direct evidence of any plot. More over, they say, a key CIA source who had claimed knowledge of the plot, has been discredited.

October 29, 2004. Seven days later - four days before the Presidential election - the first supposedly new, datable tape of Osama Bin Laden since December 2001 is aired on the Al-Jazeera Network. A Bush-Cheney campaign official anonymously tells the New York Daily News that from his campaign’s point of view, the tape is quote “a little gift.”

Number Twelve:

May 5th, 2005. 88 members of the United States House of Representatives send a letter to President Bush demanding an investigation of the so-called “Downing Street Memo” - a British document which describes purported American desire dating to 2002 to "fix" the evidence to fit the charges against Iraq. In Iraq over the following weekend, car bombings escalate. On the 11th, more than 75 Iraqis are killed in one.

May 11th, 2005. Later that day, an instructor and student pilot violate restricted airspace in Washington D.C. It is an event that happens hundreds of times a year, but this time the plane gets to within three miles of the White House. The Capitol is evacuated; Vice President Cheney, the First Lady, and Nancy Reagan are all rushed to secure locations. The President, biking through woods, is not immediately notified.

Number Thirteen:

June 26th, 2005. A Gallup poll suggests that 61 percent of the American public believes the President does not have a plan in Iraq. On the 28th, Mr. Bush speaks to the nation from Fort Bragg: "We fight today because terrorists want to attack our country and kill our citizens, and Iraq is where they are making their stand. So we'll fight them there, we'll fight them across the world, and we will stay in the fight until the fight is won."

June 29th 2005. The next day, another private pilot veers into restricted airspace, the Capitol is again evacuated, and this time, so is the President.
 
DONT LABEL ME!, making unjustified accusations at the president without an arguement is dumb.
 
wvrevy said:
You'll just dismiss with the usual "nuh-uh" and keep chuggin' that kool aid.

(BTW...Here is the link to the full article: The Nexus of Politics and Terror

so we dont think? just because we argue for pre :rolleyes: sident bush we dont think? :rolleyes: i am sorry, but calling ppl ignorant and that they just follow the pres blindly is a VERY harsh thing.
 

Seeing that article, I must apologize for being factually incorrect in my original post. I stated that the adminstration employed the tactic 48-72 hours after bad news, but I am mistaken. It appears that on occasion the administration has waited as much as 4-7 days before attempting to redirect the American public from the truth.

I humbly apologize to the board for my factual error, and thanks to wvrevy for paying attention and being a true patriot!
 
momof2inPA said:
Maybe it won't be a terror alert, but the dreaded FLU SHOT SHORTAGE...

Not again...it was funny how that was HUGE NEWS and then all of a sudden you just stopped hearing about it.
 
DarkSideMoon said:
DONT LABEL ME!, making unjustified accusations at the president without an arguement is dumb.

Hmmm....actually, it's a very justified argument. Thirteen examples of justification, in fact. We breathlessly await your refudiation of the facts presented above.....
 
ducklite said:
Cover the walls and windows. And don't forget you need to fashion the aluminum foil helmets with a coat hanger sticking out the top.

Anne
ITS NOT A COAT HANGER! It is a metalic brain protection device, or MBPD for short.
 
DarkSideMoon said:
so we dont think? just because we argue for pre :rolleyes: sident bush we dont think? :rolleyes: i am sorry, but calling ppl ignorant and that they just follow the pres blindly is a VERY harsh thing.
I think it is the ' :rolleyes: ' in the middle of the sentence and the chat abreviations that are getting you labled, not the argument. jmo. :confused3
 
Sparx said:
I think it is the ' :rolleyes: ' in the middle of the sentence and the chat abreviations that are getting you labled, not the argument. jmo. :confused3
oops, i pressed the wrong button, kill me.
 
Mugg Mann said:
Hmmm....actually, it's a very justified argument. Thirteen examples of justification, in fact. We breathlessly await your refudiation of the facts presented above.....
yes, but all you did was bash the president in your first post, if it werent for other ppl posting, then you would have no arguement.
 
Sparx said:
ITS NOT A COAT HANGER! It is a metalic brain protection device, or MBPD for short.

Oops! My bad. I forgot that they chenged the terminology in the latest edition of the "Aliens: A Practical Guide in Modern Day Assimilation" handbook. Was there anything else I might have forgotten about?

Anne
 
DarkSideMoon said:
yes, but all you did was bash the president in your first post, if it werent for other ppl posting, then you would have no arguement.

Let's take what you said point by point, nice and slowly;

1. Please re-read the original post. I pointed out one of the known strategies of the Bush administration when unfavorable news is made public. At no point in the post did I "bash the president" on an individual basis. My predictions (which are separate from facts) made in that post are based on repeated examples of events that have occured. Your accusation is factually incorrect.

2. My argument is sound, and all wvrevy did was expand upon it it. At no point did she contradict anything I had put forth. Please point out any argument in her post that contradicts any argument made in my original post.

3. Please point out anything factually incorrect (aside from my confessed mea culpa over the time line in post #25) in either of our posts. A similar challenge was issued by wvrevy, and as of this writing, I applaud your success in avoiding having to address the factual challenge laid out before you by both of us.
 
Mugg Mann said:
Let's take what you said point by point, nice and slowly;

1. Please re-read the original post. I pointed out one of the known strategies of the Bush administration when unfavorable news is made public. At no point in the post did I "bash the president" on an individual basis. My predictions (which are separate from facts) made in that post are based on repeated examples of events that have occured. Your accusation is factually incorrect.

2. My argument is sound, and all wvrevy did was expand upon it it. At no point did she contradict anything I had put forth. Please point out any argument in her post that contradicts any argument made in my original post.

3. Please point out anything factually incorrect (aside from my confessed mea culpa over the time line in post #25) in either of our posts. A similar challenge was issued by wvrevy, and as of this writing, I applaud your success in avoiding having to address the factual challenge laid out before you by both of us.


i dont think you can take issues with what wrevvy( spelled wrong) out up and thats why no one has
 
Since you don't know what to do with the sheets let's ask Robert Byrd (D). Cut two holes for eyes and wear it over your head. That's what the racist used to do and still to this day gets a free pass!!! Amazing, maybe he can be on the next amazing M&M commercial!! :rotfl2:
 
superbird said:
Since you don't know what to do with the sheets let's ask Robert Byrd (D). Cut two holes for eyes and wear it over your head. That's what the racist used to do and still to this day gets a free pass!!! Amazing, maybe he can be on the next amazing M&M commercial!! :rotfl2:

I think Jesse Helms would make a better M&M.
 
superbird said:
Since you don't know what to do with the sheets let's ask Robert Byrd (D). Cut two holes for eyes and wear it over your head.

So are you saying that dressing up like Casper the Friendly Ghost is how the aliens will find us to take us to the mothership? Last I knew the question was wire or wood.

Anne
 
ducklite said:
So are you saying that dressing up like Casper the Friendly Ghost is how the aliens will find us to take us to the mothership? Last I knew the question was wire or wood.

Anne

I think the poster was commenting on the fact that Robert Byrd was once a member of the KKK.
 
I'm waiting for DarkSideMoon to accuse the person who posted the Robert Byrd comment of bashing...but there's been no response. All he did was post a factual comment about Robert Byrd once being a member of the KKK. Of course, since that comment had absolutely nothing to do with the rest of the thread, one could easily consider that bashing. Don't you agree, DarkSideMoon, or have you been too busy at the library trying to find a factually-based response to the challenges put in front of you to respond?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom