Rumor is Fall.New board member here. Is there a definite closing date rumor that was talked about previously?
Rumor is Fall.New board member here. Is there a definite closing date rumor that was talked about previously?
Here's the problem with tacking on an age thing with this broad "younger folk" thought-process....I'm 28 will be 29 next month. My husband is 27 will be 28 in July. We enjoy GMR-it's not our favorite but it's not unliked either. I assure you as be under 30 (even right at the cutoff) those classics are what I grew up with. My iffiness with GMR is usually the inconsistencies I felt when it came to the CMs doing our tour not with the lack of interest in the theming.
My opinion though is the ride doesn't need everyone to have seen every movie it is paying homage to in order to enjoy it. If anything I think perhaps the execution of being in a slow moving vehicle is what can contribute to boredom;maybe it's just the lack of things that make you jump, things that have a little bit more thrill to it that lead to boredom (I like a mix of slow rides with some thrill rides personally for theme parks).
*End tangent lol*
ETA: I do agree though (and I might have in the past IDK lol) with Madonna3 in that a mix of newer and older scenes would be much more ideal than removing the ride entirely for a new ride.
Per all i have seen the facade will stay and this will be an internal buildDo the current rumored plans still indicate keeping the Chinese Theatre facade and only redoing the insides?
Do the current rumored plans still indicate keeping the Chinese Theatre facade and only redoing the insides?
Per all i have seen the facade will stay and this will be an internal build
Let me preface this by saying I am not advocating that the facade be torn down...but I'm struggling to see where it's place is in the park. I feel like there is no cohesion to the park - currently and even after TSL and SWE open. Although as I type/think about it, I guess DCA is kind of the same...you have Hollywood Land, Cars Land, Paradise Pier, etc.
The theater is your focal point. So many of Hollywood biggest movies have debuted there. This park is still about movies but rather putting you inside the movie instead of seeing how movies are made.Let me preface this by saying I am not advocating that the facade be torn down...but I'm struggling to see where it's place is in the park. I feel like there is no cohesion to the park - currently and even after TSL and SWE open. Although as I type/think about it, I guess DCA is kind of the same...you have Hollywood Land, Cars Land, Paradise Pier, etc.
The theater is your focal point. So many of Hollywood biggest movies have debuted there. This park is still about movies but rather putting you inside the movie instead of seeing how movies are made.
For the most part it all still ties together through the simple theme of Movies and T.V. The only attraction that seems out of place by that thought is RnR which, despite being one of my favorite WDW rides, has always been an odd theme choice in my opinion. But everything else ties together loosely. The misnomer is the actual park name, not the content of the park. "Studios" needs to go. If it was called Disney's Hollywood Experience (and dear lord I hope the Imagineers can do better than that!) it would all pretty much make sense.