If you believe in science, then you understand that claims need to be backed up ;-)
Not saying you are wrong, but science is based on proving what you say is correct.
What
@choirfarm is referring to is a more reliable figure to measure deaths.
Below the figures of the Netherlands, the average death count over the years is between the two grey lines. Everything above the top grey line is excess mortality, everything under the bottom grey line is under-mortality.
The first peak was during an influenza epidemic causing almost 3000 extra deaths than normal over a 15 week period. The second is the Covid peak. We are now back at normal level. What we did see was a decrease in people dying in car accidents (for example) as less people on the roads the past few months.
But the thing is, is it lying, bending the truth or just playing with figures? People who died most likely due to Covid, but weren't tested, as many people in eldery homes etc. can only be added to the count after they do an autopsy. But what if the autopsy reveals the person was infected with Covid, was that then also the cause of death? For people with underlying diseases it might not be THE cause of death, but it did contribute to the death. Is it then still a Covid death?
Each country and in the US probably each state & county has their own definition what a Covid-related death is. There are countries who count everyone above the normal figures as Covid-deaths, just assuming they had it. That's why Belgium has so many more deaths then other comparable EU countries. Is it the right figure, no one knows. And we never will.