I'm so confused!!! 
I see G&T mentioned. Then, AP, honors etc. I would not consider AP and Honors gifted and talented. Heck, I was in many AP and Honors classes and no way was I gifted and talented. So, I googled it and I am surprised by the defintion. Turns out if I were in other schools I would have been G&T by today's standards. But, because my school offered AP & Honors classes I was not. Thanks to the NCLB, looks like the definition really encompasses a lot of students who are not gifted and talented per se, but who go to schools where advanced classes are not ordinarily provided by their schools. Perhaps schools label students as G&T to get the funds to offer these classes? Maybe I'm wrong but I don't see any mention of IQ in this definition. Maybe that's why there is so much confusion; there is no clear cut definition??
The Federal Definition of Gifted and Talented in NCLB (US) The term “gifted and talented”, when used with respect to students, children, or youth, means students, children, or youth who give evidence of high achievement capability in areas such as intellectual, creative, artistic, or leadership capacity, or in specific academic fields, and who need services or activities not ordinarily provided by the school in order to fully develop those capabilities.(Title IX, Part A, Section 9101(22), p. 544)
Note: States and districts are not required to use the federal definition, although many states base their definitions on the federal definition.
Programs for gifted and talented students exist in every state and in many school districts, but the number and percentage of students identified as gifted and talented vary from state to state due to differences in state laws and local practices.
I then researched further and if you google "gifted and talented by state" you will see it varies greatly state to state. In MA, for example, there is no state definition and they are not required to provide any thing extra for G&T.

I see G&T mentioned. Then, AP, honors etc. I would not consider AP and Honors gifted and talented. Heck, I was in many AP and Honors classes and no way was I gifted and talented. So, I googled it and I am surprised by the defintion. Turns out if I were in other schools I would have been G&T by today's standards. But, because my school offered AP & Honors classes I was not. Thanks to the NCLB, looks like the definition really encompasses a lot of students who are not gifted and talented per se, but who go to schools where advanced classes are not ordinarily provided by their schools. Perhaps schools label students as G&T to get the funds to offer these classes? Maybe I'm wrong but I don't see any mention of IQ in this definition. Maybe that's why there is so much confusion; there is no clear cut definition??
The Federal Definition of Gifted and Talented in NCLB (US) The term “gifted and talented”, when used with respect to students, children, or youth, means students, children, or youth who give evidence of high achievement capability in areas such as intellectual, creative, artistic, or leadership capacity, or in specific academic fields, and who need services or activities not ordinarily provided by the school in order to fully develop those capabilities.(Title IX, Part A, Section 9101(22), p. 544)
Note: States and districts are not required to use the federal definition, although many states base their definitions on the federal definition.
Programs for gifted and talented students exist in every state and in many school districts, but the number and percentage of students identified as gifted and talented vary from state to state due to differences in state laws and local practices.
I then researched further and if you google "gifted and talented by state" you will see it varies greatly state to state. In MA, for example, there is no state definition and they are not required to provide any thing extra for G&T.
It's becoming more blatant among the upper level classes (honors, AP etc.). Thing is, the kids will tell you "but it's done!" like that's the goal.