SAHDad
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 2,343
I think the mess up in the system came with converting the goofy runners (and now Dopey) runners to one bib for both the half and full. We are seeded by the full time and most goofy/dopey folks I talked with thought they were well placed in the full. Where the rub comes is that the half is a slower paced population on average so an I, J, K or further back placement put you well behind similarly paced runners.
I do think the race needs to go back to a separate bib for both the half and full so that all runners are placed in their appropriate corral.
For the full, it wasn't too bad, except that I would have actually been faster if I had been placed several corrals forward. For both the half and the full, within the first mile, I caught up and passed the back of I, and was into H before the end of mile 2. But that cost me time (bobbing and weaving), and the character lines were so long, each character stop brought a lot of H and I back up to where I was. (I learned why people farther back don't always stop for characters - last year, some of the lines were 20 people long, and I considered that long. . . until this year, when I saw lines of 80 people. Stopping for those took much longer this year than last year, obviously.)
A corral or two forward, and the lines would have been shorter. Not much, but enough that, when compounded over a dozen or more stops, starts to add up to a real difference in the time.
(I was injured in Nov, and it blew a hole in my training, so I am not going to claim a sub-4 or anything, but I think I could have done a sub-5, or near enough, if I had started in H instead of J. A quick check of my camera shows about 30 separate character stops, so the difference of just a few people per line would start to make a pretty substantial difference.)
tl;dr version - next time, I'll hammer out a 10k (for a half), of a half (for the full), and submit that. Either of those should bump me up quite a bit.