Originally posted by BuckNaked
Not to try to hijack the thread, but since your response was to a post that I was encouraged to make in this thread, I see no reason why I shouldn't be able to answer in the same thread.
For the record, I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh or any radio talking heads, other than a local drive time talk host who is quite the moderate. So, the statement is my own, no one else's, and I stand by it.
The current tax code stifles achievement, success and hard work by telling people that after a certain point, they are really working for only 2/3 of their pay, possibly less. They have 1/3 or more of their pay taken from their paycheck to pay for services that they don't need and won't use, all while the money is given to people that aren't trying or working as hard. And I'm not talking about people that need help in the short term - few of us, if any, don't know someone that has needed a helping hand at one time or another, and I'm all for that. What I'm not for is continuing to pay people to sit home and collect the federal paycheck. I'm not for sending checks out to people every April 15 that didn't pay a single penny in federal income tax. I'm not for telling people that they can live in free federal housing, take foodstamps for their groceries and welfare for their kids without lifting a finger to try to better their situation. That situation does indeed reward failure and punish success.
I'm sorry that you can't see that you don't own logic - the fact that someone disagrees with you and supports Bush doesn't mean that they are illogical or stupid. It simply means that not everyone shares your priorities or agrees that the federal government should be the nanny of those that choose to not better their lives.