Federal court sides with Disney in lead das lawsuit

[SueM in MN]

And in other cases with other amusement parks, the parks simply needed to outline how the park operates for every other guest. The service that is provided to every other guest; for the price of entry admission, the guest will ride on the ride after waiting his/her turn for the ride.

So, "fundamentally alter the services provided by the defendant" is really easy for a park to show. Allowing immediate access to a ride is not the service that the park provides to anyone.

And with Disney, the DAS is providing the same service.

I agree and the judge did discuss that.
I meant it would not be easy for the plaintiffs to prove that getting what they wanted (GAC back for just them) would not fundamentally alter the service.

 

[buffettgirl]

I agree and the judge did discuss that.
I meant it would not be easy for the plaintiffs to prove that getting what they wanted (GAC back for just them) would not fundamentally alter the service.

Ah, gotcha. And precisely; The plaintiffs could not prove that. Every person that gets unlimited rides does alter the service.

 

[Baklava]

see the thing is some people just need to accept that certain things are no longer possible. I have had to give up many rides that I formerly could do but are no longer in the cards. some things CANNOT be accommodated no matter how much you stamp your feet and cry discrimination. and no body is entitled to the exact accommodation they demand.

Precisely. Accommodations can't ever fix everything.

There is no reasonable accommodation for me to view Fantasmic! at DLR. You'd have to give my party VIP viewing space and that's not really a fair expectation. I can pay for premium seating or skip it until we get back to WDW. Throwing a fit at Disney because my issues make me an exception isn't really rational.