Originally posted by pheneix
That works out to 60 million hours stolen from a segment of guests and given to a select few...
Who's fault is that then?Originally posted by pheneix
but that time is still stolen by the guests who choose not to, and that is not fair at all
So Disney may not have been the first, but they weren't far behind. Alton Towers began using their "VQ" during the summer of 1999. Disney had FastPass up and running the end of '99/start of 2000.Originally posted by pheneix
And as far as Disney pioneering the ride reservation concept, that's not really true either. Alton Towers in England was the first park ever to use such a system
So would you rather wait 60 minutes for Space Mountain and then another 60 minutes for Alien Encounter? Wasting what little time the park is open just waiting in lines?What I mean't by that comment was that 60 million hours was stolen by the masses waiting in line so that the select few who had Fastpasses could gain it.
What is the difference if you wait 2 hours for Space and walk onto Alien? What's saved? You just spent more time in one line.So would you rather wait 60 minutes for Space Mountain and then another 60 minutes for Alien Encounter? Wasting what little time the park is open just waiting in lines?
There is no difference. I was trying to make the point that with FastPass, you can obtain a pass for Space Mountain, then wait 60 minutes for Alien Encounter. Once off Alien Encounter you walk right on to Space Mountain. So instead of waiting a total of 120 minutes for two rides, you have now only waited 60 minutes (half the time) for the same two rides.Originally posted by HB2K
What is the difference if you wait 2 hours for Space and walk onto Alien? What's saved? You just spent more time in one line.
I'm sure that severely limiting the number of people who could possibly be waiting in the line had nothing to do with it....Yet, during MVMCP that same line had a posted time of 15 minutes. Did Santa make the ride run more efficently?
No he turned off fast pass.
I think the point is that with the introduction of FastPast, the stand-by wait time to ride ride B while you are in a virtual queue for ride A is dramatically increased from what it would be without FastPass.I was trying to make the point that with FastPass, you can obtain a pass for Space Mountain, then wait 60 minutes for Alien Encounter. Once off Alien Encounter you walk right on to Space Mountain. So instead of waiting a total of 120 minutes for two rides, you have now only waited 60 minutes (half the time) for the same two rides.
HB2k was comparing lines of similar length meaning the same number of people in that line. It doesn't matter how full the rest of the park is due to MVMCP vs. a regular busy day. He is saying the ride processes far fewer stand-by people when FastPass is on than it processes regular riders when FastPass is off.I'm sure that severely limiting the number of people who could possibly be waiting in the line had nothing to do with it....
I still don't understand your reasoning that "some" benefit when the privelige is afforded to everyone.Originally posted by pheneix
Yes, at the expense of others. Some benefit.
As I said earlier, I guess I'm biased because I only got during slower times of the year, February, May, and October.Not when every Fastpass is swiped up by lunch on a busy summer day.
Not all the time. Now Universal offers a ticket book that gives you between 6 and 10 tickets that you can use at ANY attraction and get to the front of the line. You can purchase them at any ticket booth or guest services.Universal's program is still free to all guests, so that part of the program is still on par with Disney's.
So it is ok to offer this benefit is your are separating is by class structure? That doesn't seem very fair to me.The only people that do get an added benefit are the people that are paying 3 to 4 times as much for their time with Universal, and it is perfectly acceptable for Universal to offer a benefit for them.
Disney could never offer this to their resort guests like Universal does, there are for more hotel rooms and guests on Disney property. So it's far that because you are staying on-site at Universal property that you can get to the front of the line on any ride, whenever you want, and however many times you want? I would think that would add to more congestion.If Disney were to ever do this for their resort guests, I would find it perfectly acceptable for them too.
I haven't noticed a difference in standard between the way that Disney and Universal load their FastPass/Express guests and their stand-by line guests. If anything I feel that Disney has the better system because more of their rides are on a dual load system. One dedicated to FastPass and the other stand-by. When the FastPass line starts to thin and there are no arriving FastPass guests then stand-by guests are ushered over to the FastPass line. I haven't seen this type of loading style done at Universal. You usually see a group of stand-by, then a small party of Express guests, then another large group of stand-by... etc...I should also add that Universal has a better handle on their express system than Disney does, and the stand-by line does not take much of a hit at all compared to the crippling that goes on at Disney.
You and HB2K really lost me with this line of reasoning. You may be right about the attendance pattern you outline. However, you are comparing apples to oranges. When we were at the MK the first week of December this year they weren't even using fastpass as the crowds were so low. During the day there may have been a 45 minute line, but everyone had to wait in it - so you couldn't have a problem with that. During MVMCP on the same day you might only have a 15 minute line, and there might be just as many people in the park, but the focus of MVMCP for many is the shows and not the rides. I just can't buy your argument.MVMCP attendance is usually significantly higher than the average daily attendance in December, save for the last week and a half in the month.