mshanson3121
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,211
Yes. Because you get less parks. Half as many.
So what? Not like you get free passes to the parks. If they included park entry, then that argument would hold weight.
Yes. Because you get less parks. Half as many.
Is there anything you won't defend Disney for doing.Yes. Because you get less parks. Half as many.
they keep this up, they're going to have a hard time filling them. they're going to run people off. Unless we get real perks, or a massive discount, our days of staying onsite are over. i'll never pay what i paid last week for a value ever again, ever.Like it or not, it's not the values or the mods that Disney is having trouble filling up- it's the deluxes. And so they need to add perks to them. There's only so much you can do at the physical property to entice people.
I really dislike when people bandy words and phrases like "high class" and "peasants" to label guests staying at different resort levels. There are plenty of high-income families that choose value resorts because they like them. And conversely, there are a lot of middle-income earners who save in order to make a deluxe resort stay a part of their vacation. This class warfare attitude rubs me the wrong way.It's totally a negative. What used to be a perk for every resort guest is now only for high class citizens and the peasants get nothing. Can't wait to see what they do with FP. I'm guessing if you're an All Stars guest just be happy to be on property.
No. Because those things weren't taken away from me previously. And those are things you purchase a la carte. They aren't mixed in with what else is going on for other guests. Yes, some of them get into the FP line, but the numbers are pretty minimal in the overall scheme of things, so of almost no consequence to the general public.
Why does that matter? It's still cheaper then then Glorified Motel 6....I mean All Stars.
Absolutely- Disney should have had construction back up and running full speed weeks after the pandemic started. They didn't keep it shut down to be safe. They did it to save money. Just as one example.Is there anything you won't defend Disney for doing.
i think a lot of people use those terms in how disney treats them.I really dislike when people bandy words and phrases like "high class" and "peasants" to label guests staying at different resort levels. There are plenty of high-income families that choose value resorts because they like them. And conversely, there are a lot of middle-income earners who save in order to make a deluxe resort stay a part of their vacation. This class warfare attitude rubs me the wrong way.
This is a marketing strategy to incentivize reservations at deluxe resorts. It isn't meant to pigeonhole guests into socio-economic classes based on where they are staying.
it rotated, but i know that when we would go for a week, we could hit magic hours in the evening at all 4 parks, and sometimes be able to repeat them...it was well worth it when they offered 3 hours.I understand your point. But with respect to the "old" EMH, I recall if being very sporadic- most days it was one park, some days it was none, in a week, one park might have it three times and one park might not have it at all...at least from what we've seen here, it seems like every morning, all four parks.
I don't like it. They aren't giving extra to deluxe, they are giving the same while taking away from the rest.
But I'm still not paying them $600 a night for a room.
Sorry that rubs any one the wrong way. With the way things are going it totally is creating a seperate set of class. All the power to them. For me the more they keep doing this the less reason I have to want to go. It's saddens me as I have a 2 year old that wanted to take to Disney.I really dislike when people bandy words and phrases like "high class" and "peasants" to label guests staying at different resort levels. There are plenty of high-income families that choose value resorts because they like them. And conversely, there are a lot of middle-income earners who save in order to make a deluxe resort stay a part of their vacation. This class warfare attitude rubs me the wrong way.
This is a marketing strategy to incentivize reservations at deluxe resorts. It isn't meant to pigeonhole guests into socio-economic classes based on where they are staying.
Well, because in the last year, they took it away for EVERYBODY. It's been reset, basically. So now it's going to be offered only to Deluxe guests. That's better than them just not bringing it back at all.
Like it or not, it's not the values or the mods that Disney is having trouble filling up- it's the deluxes. And so they need to add perks to them. There's only so much you can do at the physical property to entice people.
I tend to agree with this. I've heard Disney has been having a hard time filling Deluxe resort rooms (and am guessing this is why they're converting some of GF to DVC rooms).
Leaving one park a night open for 1-2 extra hours is far cheaper than reducing the price per night at a deluxe resort.You can lower the prices to make them more affordable. I stayed at Yacht Club twice, loved the resort; would love to stay there again, but they passed my price point a couple of years back, I'm not paying $600 plus a night. I can stay at the Waldorf or Four Seasons for that price.
That doesn’t make it any better. If anyone thinks that Disney treats any of its guests as peasants they don’t understand the plight of people who really are struggling or being held back. At best, it is a questionable use of hyperbole.i think a lot of people use those terms in how disney treats them.
there are big differences
oh good lord. Ok.That doesn’t make it any better. If anyone thinks that Disney treats any of its guests as peasants they don’t understand the plight of people who really are struggling or being held back. At best, it is a questionable use of hyperbole.