Okay - several years ago I purchased two of these printers - one for me and one for my adult DD.. One of the main reasons we got it was for the Disney (and other) frames you could choose to place around our photos.. That has pretty much been a bust.. On the screen they are so small I can't see them in order to choose what I want (due to my vision problems) and when I tried to register for their Creative Zone - hoping I could see them there - it wouldn't go through.. Fine - I can live without that - even though it did influence my purchases..
On the plus side, I have never seen photos turn out as well as these do (a hundred times better than the Kodak printer that was purchased for me to use with my Kodak Digital Camera).. They are far and away superior to any prints I could get at a store.. The cost would actually be less per photo except for the problems that I have with the printer and that's where my vent comes in..
Every single time I go to use it (I keep it up on my shelf in my bedroom as that is the only place I have to store it - and of course I also bring it to the lake with me), the heads have to be aligned and/or cleaned again.. This takes a considerable amount of Epson ink and paper - substitutions are not available.. The pack with the ink and 4x6 glossy photo paper is not cheap when you have to waste a quarter of the ink and many, many sheets of photo paper to try to align the heads.. And the process - where you have to pick out the squares with the least bands/lines in them are so teeny, tiny, even a person with perfect vision is hard pressed to see them and make the correct selection.. When (and if) you're lucky enough to get that done, 9 times out of ten you have to clean the heads(nozzles) too - wasting more ink and paper.. Grrr..
It's SO frustrating - because the photos are awesome - but it even states right in the manual that you need to take these actions whenever you move it.. (It also runs on battery so you can "print on the go".. Yeah - right..)
I could understand if you were tossing it around, tipping it sideways, throwing it in your car, slamming it down on your desk or kitchen table - but simply moving it from the shelf to the desk should not cause the need to do all of these maintenance actions.. And it would certainly be helpful if you could actually SEE the squares for the alignment process so you could choose the correct ones.. (I have to use a magnifying glass..)
I'm so disappointed - because I love the photos that it produces - eventually.. I just had to print out some photos I need to take to my dr. on Tuesday and it took me well over 2 hours to get it aligned (so the photos weren't lines after lines after lines - a total mess..) All this for 6 photos!
Does anyone else who owns one of these have the same - or similar - issues? (DD's does the same thing..)
In the back of the manual it does state that if you're not satisfied with the number of photos you are getting from the ink/photo pack you can return the unused paper with your recipt & the UPC and they will reimburse you $1.10 for each sheet of paper - but that's not exactly what the problem is..
Would it do any good to email them about my concerns in regards to not being able to move the printer even in the gentlest manner - from the shelf to my desk (no room to keep it there in one place even if I wanted to and it's supposed to be "portable) - without having to go through the realignment & head (nozzle) cleaning process every single time - wasting my ink and photo paper?
It seems like the only way I can use it to my advantage is to go through that entire process and then sit and print out a couple of hundred photos at one time so I don't end up wasting the paper and ink on maintenance..
If there's nothing else I can do, can anyone here reccomend another small, portable printer - specifically for photos only - that produces the awesome quality that the Epson does once I finally get it working right?
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated - even as cranky as I'm feeling right now - LOL..
On the plus side, I have never seen photos turn out as well as these do (a hundred times better than the Kodak printer that was purchased for me to use with my Kodak Digital Camera).. They are far and away superior to any prints I could get at a store.. The cost would actually be less per photo except for the problems that I have with the printer and that's where my vent comes in..
Every single time I go to use it (I keep it up on my shelf in my bedroom as that is the only place I have to store it - and of course I also bring it to the lake with me), the heads have to be aligned and/or cleaned again.. This takes a considerable amount of Epson ink and paper - substitutions are not available.. The pack with the ink and 4x6 glossy photo paper is not cheap when you have to waste a quarter of the ink and many, many sheets of photo paper to try to align the heads.. And the process - where you have to pick out the squares with the least bands/lines in them are so teeny, tiny, even a person with perfect vision is hard pressed to see them and make the correct selection.. When (and if) you're lucky enough to get that done, 9 times out of ten you have to clean the heads(nozzles) too - wasting more ink and paper.. Grrr..
It's SO frustrating - because the photos are awesome - but it even states right in the manual that you need to take these actions whenever you move it.. (It also runs on battery so you can "print on the go".. Yeah - right..)
I could understand if you were tossing it around, tipping it sideways, throwing it in your car, slamming it down on your desk or kitchen table - but simply moving it from the shelf to the desk should not cause the need to do all of these maintenance actions.. And it would certainly be helpful if you could actually SEE the squares for the alignment process so you could choose the correct ones.. (I have to use a magnifying glass..)
I'm so disappointed - because I love the photos that it produces - eventually.. I just had to print out some photos I need to take to my dr. on Tuesday and it took me well over 2 hours to get it aligned (so the photos weren't lines after lines after lines - a total mess..) All this for 6 photos!

Does anyone else who owns one of these have the same - or similar - issues? (DD's does the same thing..)
In the back of the manual it does state that if you're not satisfied with the number of photos you are getting from the ink/photo pack you can return the unused paper with your recipt & the UPC and they will reimburse you $1.10 for each sheet of paper - but that's not exactly what the problem is..
Would it do any good to email them about my concerns in regards to not being able to move the printer even in the gentlest manner - from the shelf to my desk (no room to keep it there in one place even if I wanted to and it's supposed to be "portable) - without having to go through the realignment & head (nozzle) cleaning process every single time - wasting my ink and photo paper?
It seems like the only way I can use it to my advantage is to go through that entire process and then sit and print out a couple of hundred photos at one time so I don't end up wasting the paper and ink on maintenance..

If there's nothing else I can do, can anyone here reccomend another small, portable printer - specifically for photos only - that produces the awesome quality that the Epson does once I finally get it working right?
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated - even as cranky as I'm feeling right now - LOL..
