Eisner vs. Iger

ChickenCarlos

<font color=darkorchid>"Shift yer cargo dearie, sh
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
1,299
I am writing a paper about leadership, and i need a disney fans perspective on things, who do you think ran the company better, former CEO Michael Eisner or current CEO Robert Iger?
 
I am writing a paper about leadership, and i need a disney fans perspective on things, who do you think ran the company better, former CEO Michael Eisner or current CEO Robert Iger?


.......Eisner because he brought Disney out of the dank stagnant world of Disneyland or Disneyworld & THAT'S IT. He presided over a time where there were many discoveries like Epcot and the birth of the Disney cruise line.

Moreover, he was there during the advent of the Disney channel & IMO, he also just overall helped to bring the world of Disney out of the dark ages and into the modern era of "All things Disney." Yes, there were many a day of many an argument between him & Diane Disney (she wanted to preserve the status quo) as he wanted to expand the parks with him eventually being kicked off the board but I do give him overall credit for bringing Disney into what it is today.



IMO, he wasn't about money, he was more of an indiviudual who was there to expand the mindset of the old guard. Yes, he did also receive help from Roy on this but IMO, I feel that he ran it during a time of great expansionism or if you will , a "can do" attitude prevailed there while during Igor's time, Disney is more being ran like a big evil empire (oops! break out the flame throwers;)).

Eisner also helped improve "Touchtone Pictures" and brought it to the cusp of what you currently see: PIXAR.


Yes, there is "Pixar," but look at how Igot treated them and don't forget how the Jim Henson company had to SUE DISNEY for copyright infringement a few years ago as well.


Ok.....just my .02 cents worth.


Me? Love Disney and good luck with your research.:goodvibes



T.T.F.N.
 
I moved this over to the Community section of the DL board.:goodvibes
 
thanks for your input, and thanks for moving to correct section, i figured there was a spot for it but not sure where, i would love to hear more on the subject if anybody else has more points to point out.
 

Eisner,
brought Disney into a new real, He made it a modern company in a number of ways. I think he made it into a real movie studio somthing it hadn't been since the 50's. I mean it had been making films but is was being outplayed by every other studio. I think tiering it through different production companies for G, PG and R was the way to go. Frankly I was shocked when I saw recent a list of movies that Disney had a hand in. Thier rankings are incredible.

But Eisner was brought in to please shareholders and I think he did by sacrificing what was more holy at the company. He starts Paris and tokyo parks which Disney barely owns. He develops WDW into tons of resorts which are pooly tiered. I feel like instead of the delux being better the Value was cheapened. But the whole time he was trying gimicks in the parks to raise attendance instead of investing in the quality of the parks. At the same time somthing must of been wrong at WDI for a group of them to leave and goto Universal.

Iger I think is more park focused which is the root of Disney's quality and the animation has been maintained. Also Disney's new nature films hark back to the nature films it made in the 50-60's, very cutting edge and amazing stuff.

I think Iger is less Wall Street and has more trouble than Eisner did catering to Shareholders. But I think Iger is less autocratic and is happy to let good division leaders running their areas.
 
You really need to read Disney Wars which discusses Eisner's tenure. There was another book, cannot remember the name of it, which discusses the years leading up to the Eisner years.

You really need to remember the state of the company after Walt and Roy's deaths. The movie and animation units went in the toilet. Everyone was walking around asking: "What would Walt do?". Their only answer was the creation of Epcot which was a financial disaster when it opened. Walt had purposefully acquired all that land in Orlando and for 20 years it was forest land!

In comes Eisner and Team Disney is invented. His protege Katzenberg started revitalizing the motion picture units and then asked: Why won't Animation work in this day and age? He proved it could with Beauty and the Beast, Lion King, and countless other movies that were instant Classics.

Overall, Eisner was a very neurotic person. He ran off Katzenberg. He brings in his best friend Ovitz, sets him up to fail and fires him 15 months later. Those two blunders cost shareholders approximately 450 MILLION!

Eisner almost ruined the relationship with Steve Jobs and almost allowed Pixar to walk away. Iger's first task was to revive the Pixar relationship. Disney ultimately paid a price for Pixar that was astronomical compared to the small price Eisner could have paid 10 years before. Then there was the crazy acquisition of the Family channel, losses at Euro Disney and a huge write-off on a failed Internet Portal.

On the other hand, the purchase of ABC Cap Cities has brought them untold profits - much of it led by ESPN. He also launched the Cruise Line which is a cash cow.

In the end, I think Eisner was a very flawed leader, but, I will always put him on a pedestal for his handling of WDW:

  • He brought us the Studio's and AK
  • Prior to the Dolphin and Swan it had been almost 20 years since a new hotel was developed on property! When Eisner took command contracts had been signed to design two very bland hotels - he cancelled those contracts and the D&S built instead. Ok, I could live without the D&S, but, look at all of the wonderful hotels and resorts built after that!

Had Eisner not taken command, you might have to drive through Sub-Divisions and Condo's to get to the Magic Kingdom (and that was being discussed)! In my opinion Eisner revived Walt's legacy and reinforced the notion that there is a Disney way of doing things. That had been lost for 20 odd years when Walt's heir-apparent's were wondering around in the dark.

I think you need to ask yourself: If you could bring back Walt for a 48 hour tour of WDW would he be happy with what he see's? I certainly believe the answer is yes - he would be. Well, Eisner was the driving force behind 75% of what you see on the property.

It is apparent to me that Iger does not have the creative spark Eisner did, but, he only must follow the creative blue-print handed to him.

One of Iger's first tasks was to have a huge Pow-Wow with the Orlando brass to create a long-term strategy for the remaining land at WDW. I have no idea what the plans hold, but, I think it was a very sound strategy.

Iger I believe is also making a strategic decision not to add a 5th Park. Rather, the new strategy is to add on to existing parks. And, that all makes sense in the economic times we find ourselves in.

Overall, I think the company is in better hands with Iger, but, will always think Eisner has a very special place in Disney lore.
 
Disney Wars was a really eye-opening book. The early Eisner years did save Disney- it was in danger of being bought and sold off in parts. But once Frank Wells died it seemed Eisner's ego got in the way. We got the beautiful DLP under Eisner, but he overreacted to the poor business it initially did and gave us California Adventure - built on-the-cheap with rides you could find at a state fair and without rides you could enjoy as a family -- and DL under his henchman Paul Pressler was a disaster - the most serious problem of course being deaths that were not the fault of the guest for the first time, but due to cheaper maintenance/training/understaffing. There's a reason Roy E Disney went from being his champion to his enemy.

Iger did indeed heal the wounds with Steve Jobs that almost lost Pixar. And he approved a budget to restore the Lilly Belle - not a lot of commercial value there so I count that in his favor. It's still being run as a business - and I'm seriously depressed over what appears to be the death of hand-drawn animation at the studios.

The other book may be Storming the Magic Kingdom.
 
I agree...I'd much rather see a hand drawn movie over a Pixar flick any day! I loved Princess & The Frog and was SO excited for a hand drawn animation
 
Also in Iger's favor - he recognized the problems with DCA and approved a massive budget redo.

I'm hoping the massive success of the re-issue of Lion King may persuade them that hand-drawn isn't obsolete.
 
I'm hoping the massive success of the re-issue of Lion King may persuade them that hand-drawn isn't obsolete.

It showed Disney it should do more remakes in 3D. Together they may proove something when the others are released.
 
I suspect you're right. We'll get more 3d.

Maybe you are or are not aware. Disney has confirmed it will be doing a few more 3D remakes.

Beauty and the Beast will come to threaters in a few months. The Little Mermaid will be the other hand animated movie planned scheduled for Fall of 2013

From Pixar, Finding Nemo in Fall of 2012, and Moster Inc. in the Winter of 2013.
 















Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top