RabbitFood
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Messages
- 340
Dawn was making a point. This story has been out there (internet/tabloids) for almost a year now, yet the "legit" media hasn't even touched it.![]()
Whats more tacky...The politician doing the sleazy acts? The reporters following the politician doing the sleazy acts and reporting it? The reporters knowing the politician is involved in sleaze, and looking the other way, why he dupes the American public?
I could be that the Legit press suppressed this story due to Mrs. Edwards illness.![]()
I understand what you're saying. However, I think this could be argued about any political story--both sides constantly whine that the press is picking on them and giving the other side a free ride. And we know that can't possibly be true.
By playing the "if it had been MY candidate" game, aren't we taking away from the issue at hand? Aren't we reducing the important issue to the old children's game of "you like him better than you like me"?
This is why I wish we could jump ahead to January 20, 2009.
wasn't he named man of the year soon therafter?

