eileenkeeney
Whatever
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2001
- Messages
- 337
Hi,
I am curious how others would handle a situation, related to a low value item, with minor damage during shipping.
I never buy insurance on low value items, because the cost of insurance, over time, adds up to far more then the value of the percent of items likely to be damaged. I know what my risk level is. I accept my risk. I am asking for advice on how to best communicate the situation to the seller.
I purchased a combination of a mini GWP pin, and a GWP map card.
The pin was the item I most wanted, but I did justify the amount I paid, based on the map being included.
The item was very poorly packaged. The pin survived, although it had so little padding, that the pin was actually poking through the package on arrival.
The card was bent.
I am very certain that the card bent during shipping. I do not even suspect that this is a case where a seller was trying to send me a damaged item (with the intent to later claim it was damaged during shipping).
There was a natural fold, in the cardboard container, used to ship the item.
The fold looked like the cardboard was cut from a sort of box that had a fold there, to be used when closing the box. The fold was then laid flat, to create a flat mailing container.
The fold in the card exactly matched this natural fold in the cardboard.
I think that the nature of the shipping container was certainly the cause of the damage.
I am wondering what I should do
1) Do nothing
2) Inform the seller, so that the seller learns something about proper packaging and is less likely to make the same mistake again.
Along with (1) or (2) above, how do people think I should handle the feedback?
a) Leave neutral feedback (I would not leave negative feedback for this sort of thing, however the last time I left a seller a neutral, he retaliated with a negative.
b) Leave no feedback.
c) Leave positive feedback.
The item was shipped quickly.
I am certain that the seller did not intentionally do anything wrong.
I actually got a good deal; due to the sellers description, I think that other buyers (in the market for the same item) may have not seen his auction, preventing me from being out-bid.
However, I would not have paid that much for the pin alone (although this pin, does sell seem to sell for more than I paid for the pin and card combined).
I am curious how others would handle a situation, related to a low value item, with minor damage during shipping.
I never buy insurance on low value items, because the cost of insurance, over time, adds up to far more then the value of the percent of items likely to be damaged. I know what my risk level is. I accept my risk. I am asking for advice on how to best communicate the situation to the seller.
I purchased a combination of a mini GWP pin, and a GWP map card.
The pin was the item I most wanted, but I did justify the amount I paid, based on the map being included.
The item was very poorly packaged. The pin survived, although it had so little padding, that the pin was actually poking through the package on arrival.
The card was bent.
I am very certain that the card bent during shipping. I do not even suspect that this is a case where a seller was trying to send me a damaged item (with the intent to later claim it was damaged during shipping).
There was a natural fold, in the cardboard container, used to ship the item.
The fold looked like the cardboard was cut from a sort of box that had a fold there, to be used when closing the box. The fold was then laid flat, to create a flat mailing container.
The fold in the card exactly matched this natural fold in the cardboard.
I think that the nature of the shipping container was certainly the cause of the damage.
I am wondering what I should do
1) Do nothing
2) Inform the seller, so that the seller learns something about proper packaging and is less likely to make the same mistake again.
Along with (1) or (2) above, how do people think I should handle the feedback?
a) Leave neutral feedback (I would not leave negative feedback for this sort of thing, however the last time I left a seller a neutral, he retaliated with a negative.
b) Leave no feedback.
c) Leave positive feedback.
The item was shipped quickly.
I am certain that the seller did not intentionally do anything wrong.
I actually got a good deal; due to the sellers description, I think that other buyers (in the market for the same item) may have not seen his auction, preventing me from being out-bid.
However, I would not have paid that much for the pin alone (although this pin, does sell seem to sell for more than I paid for the pin and card combined).

Needless to say, that I would not give feedback until I received a partial refund. I did end up leaving negative feedback for him but luckily he had already left me positive feedback. I still would have left the negative even if it had meant getting a negative myself. I look much more at a sellers negatives than positives. If it looks like buyer being irrational Iwill ignore it!