I actually read that section to mean that DVC could change the rules for renting and that the new rules would apply to new owners taking title after the rule changes and current owners only if they voted for the change. In essence, I read it as a type of grandfather ing for current owners.
Wow I only allow a very few apps(like 2) to track my location 24/7 and Disney is not one of them. They get to track when I use the app and when I’m visiting otherwise it’s a no-no.
I think you fixed it with an edit already lol, but I think my meaning got lost in the replies, I was replying to your reply to someone else when they were mentioning the 6 month/3 time exception that HOAs could still make limits within.
Yes it seems like it does, see above. The reply system made it lose the original thing I was also responding to, specifically mentioning the 6/3 exception. I was saying the exception doesn't apply so they can't use that exception to make rules and are bound by the new FL law
I think that is what he was showing....that the exception that HOAs can make more restrictive rules that all owners have to follow if they fall under the 6 month/3 parcel rule DOES not apply to Condo's.
I always believed this and when I had two reservations in my name, one for myself and another for my sister and her family, I called and talked to MS because I was afraid one of the reservations would be canceled. They said keeping both reservations under my name and control was no problem. In MDE, one reservation would show but in tiny type under the first reservation there was a link to see “all reservations”. When I would click on that the other reservation would appear. I was easily able to make LL reservations and anything else in MDE as usual with my friends and family list.
Yes this is how I read it. It got weird because its a lack of an exception applying to a law that is limiting what somebody can do. Like a double or triple negative
But the magic band would not let me into my room.
Could it be that Wyndham and Marriott is a HOA and therefore they can apply the more strict rental policy?
Mouseforward:
I read this to mean that DVC can change the rental rules as they see fit, but it then only applies to anyone who takes title (purchases) after the amendment or any current owner that agrees to the amendment. I don't think this law stops DVC from changing the rules, it just grandfathers current owners from the changes.
MB will only work on 1 room - you need to ask for a room key card for the second room.
IF that’s the case then many mega renters would have nothing to fear since they been around for longer than 2021
Yeah, I just go to the desk as well. I usually make sure I’m the first one there and I was trying to fill the fridge with some basic supplies and refillable mugs for them before they arrived and that’s pretty much impossible at Riviera. I had to check myself out of the second room and put my sister as lead at the front desk.
But the rules against commercial activity were all there as well. So they cannot limit the number of rentals specifically or outlaw renting completely, but they, per the original contracts, are still able to determine the point at which renting leaves the "personal" realm and enters the "commercial" realm, which has been in the rules the entire time
Good catch!
Who knows!?! I was picking up on the piece regarding any new amendments that apply to owners who take title after the amendment becomes effective. That piece is quite different from the common understanding here on Disboards that DVC cannot, according to this law, change the rules related to renting. IANAL, but it certainly appears to me that they can.
