There is a big difference between turning away an interested purchaser and how something is marketed. Most timeshares are marketed as something to enjoy with family, and those that are forever contracts market them as a multigenerational "gift" of lifetime vacations to your heirs. While DVC has specific contract end dates, it was marketed originally as spending quality time and making memories with all the generations of your family. See this 1992 DVC video and how many times they mention "family."Hard disagree, timeshares are marketed to people with the money to spend on them. If Disney turned away singles and couples, it would be a much smaller park.
Yes, and in the beginning what is now old Key West was marketed that way, however, the marketing has significantly changed in the past 30 yearsThere is a big difference between turning away an interested purchaser and how something is marketed. Most timeshares are marketed as something to enjoy with family, and those that are forever contracts market them as a multigenerational "gift" of lifetime vacations to your heirs. While DVC has specific contract end dates, it was marketed originally as spending quality time and making memories with all the generations of your family. See this 1992 DVC video and how many times they mention "family."
as has the product...Yes, and in the beginning what is now old Key West was marketed that way, however, the marketing has significantly changed in the past 30 years
Isn't the DVC promotional slogan "vacation you never outgrow?" WDW as a whole prides itself as a multigenerational vacation destination.There is a big difference between turning away an interested purchaser and how something is marketed. Most timeshares are marketed as something to enjoy with family, and those that are forever contracts market them as a multigenerational "gift" of lifetime vacations to your heirs. While DVC has specific contract end dates, it was marketed originally as spending quality time and making memories with all the generations of your family. See this 1992 DVC video and how many times they mention "family."
Fingers crossed!!!!Reading this discussion made me wonder whether LSL might have some king-bed studios or duos, since the duos are so popular. I even had the really wild idea that maybe LSL would be all DVC, and the wing that was previously supposed to be cash hotel rooms would instead become DVC resort studios like VGF, with a large number having king beds. If DVC wanted to create a king bed studio category, LSL would be the chance to do it.
There is a big difference between turning away an interested purchaser and how something is marketed. Most timeshares are marketed as something to enjoy with family, and those that are forever contracts market them as a multigenerational "gift" of lifetime vacations to your heirs. While DVC has specific contract end dates, it was marketed originally as spending quality time and making memories with all the generations of your family. See this 1992 DVC video and how many times they mention "family."
But I do think 70% can still be accurate if you're booking the right rooms... having not actually done the math.I always remember the DVC marketing flyer…
“Save up to 70% on vacation accommodations”
(Later changed to 50%)
Seems to me it was marketed as a way to vacation for less money.
But I do think 70% can still be accurate if you're booking the right rooms... having not actually done the math.
We are DINKS so studios and, in theory Duo Studios, align perfectly with us. And the truth of the matter is it’s Disney, they could sell a 20 sq foot box that you sleep standing up in and someone would buy it. And while I would stay in a duo, it would be a last resort for me and I wouldn’t be particularly happy about it. I’m fine with the room size, I generally could care less how big the room is (sometime I do want to splurge), but the bed is the dealbreaker for me. A Murphy bed for 2 adults just isn’t my preferred sleep surface. Shove a king bed in there and I’d be fine.Obviously couples are a thing with DVC or duo studios wouldnt exist. They tested it at Riv and it was booked enough for them to do it again at Poly and vdh.
That was over 30 years ago, a lot has changed. I think putting King beds in future duo studios would be a great addition to DVC. Obviously the Riviera tower studios are too small for a King, but it seems like the PIT duo studios could accommodate them in a future refurb, and perhaps the VDH duo studios as well (I haven't seen one in person).
I can definitely see the argument for a room that currently has 2 queen beds being reduced to 1 king turning away some members/buyers, but I don't see how a duo studio being upgraded from 1 queen to 1 king turning away anyone. So I think this would be a good upgrade if possible.
It's been a few years but the last I did the math using a super elaborate model with time value of money, opportunity cost, etc. I think I came out to 2 bedroom villas being right around 50%, studios being slightly better, 1 bedrooms being quite a bit worse, and specialty accommodations like bungalows and treehouses all over the place.But I do think 70% can still be accurate if you're booking the right rooms... having not actually done the math.
We are the same way. We had a poly duo studio with a premium view booked and I was excited, but I just couldnt get over the fact that wed be sharing a Murphy bed and cancelled. I also love jungle book and would love to book the vdh duo studio but again the bed situation doesnt appeal to us. It seems a little silly to me that were spending thousands and were a couple that sleeps in a Murphy bed.We are DINKS so studios and, in theory Duo Studios, align perfectly with us. And the truth of the matter is it’s Disney, they could sell a 20 sq foot box that you sleep standing up in and someone would buy it. And while I would stay in a duo, it would be a last resort for me and I wouldn’t be particularly happy about it. I’m fine with the room size, I generally could care less how big the room is (sometime I do want to splurge), but the bed is the dealbreaker for me. A Murphy bed for 2 adults just isn’t my preferred sleep surface. Shove a king bed in there and I’d be fine.
I'm sorry but what exactly is the problem with a Murphy bed? I'm not being sarcastic, I'm wondering if people just haven't used one of them and are thinking it's something it's not.We are the same way. We had a poly duo studio with a premium view booked and I was excited, but I just couldnt get over the fact that wed be sharing a Murphy bed and cancelled. I also love jungle book and would love to book the vdh duo studio but again the bed situation doesnt appeal to us. It seems a little silly to me that were spending thousands and were a couple that sleeps in a Murphy bed.
If it was replaced by a king and less space, I would have kept itI would actually prefer that over 1 queen and 1 Murphy, where we always end up sleeping separately to spread out. I think its kind of ridiculous that couples dont have a king bed option tbh and in our case then choose to sleep separately. We have a king bed at home and used to the extra space.
There's nothing wrong with it. We'd just like the king bed option to sleep together in and not a pull down bed for the price we pay for these rooms. To each their own. Id happily pay more than a 2 queen its just our preferenceI'm sorry but what exactly is the problem with a Murphy bed? I'm not being sarcastic, I'm wondering if people just haven't used one of them and are thinking it's something it's not.
Disney's Murphy beds use the exact same mattresses that their normal beds do. They're not inferior or less comfortable in some way like the sofa beds are.
I want a king too so that part makes sense.There's nothing wrong with it. We'd just like the king bed option to sleep together in and not a pull down bed for the price we pay for these rooms. To each their own. Id happily pay more than a 2 queen its just our preference