There is a big difference between turning away an interested purchaser and how something is marketed. Most timeshares are marketed as something to enjoy with family, and those that are forever contracts market them as a multigenerational "gift" of lifetime vacations to your heirs. While DVC has specific contract end dates, it was marketed originally as spending quality time and making memories with all the generations of your family. See this 1992 DVC video and how many times they mention "family."Hard disagree, timeshares are marketed to people with the money to spend on them. If Disney turned away singles and couples, it would be a much smaller park.
Yes, and in the beginning what is now old Key West was marketed that way, however, the marketing has significantly changed in the past 30 yearsThere is a big difference between turning away an interested purchaser and how something is marketed. Most timeshares are marketed as something to enjoy with family, and those that are forever contracts market them as a multigenerational "gift" of lifetime vacations to your heirs. While DVC has specific contract end dates, it was marketed originally as spending quality time and making memories with all the generations of your family. See this 1992 DVC video and how many times they mention "family."
as has the product...Yes, and in the beginning what is now old Key West was marketed that way, however, the marketing has significantly changed in the past 30 years
Isn't the DVC promotional slogan "vacation you never outgrow?" WDW as a whole prides itself as a multigenerational vacation destination.There is a big difference between turning away an interested purchaser and how something is marketed. Most timeshares are marketed as something to enjoy with family, and those that are forever contracts market them as a multigenerational "gift" of lifetime vacations to your heirs. While DVC has specific contract end dates, it was marketed originally as spending quality time and making memories with all the generations of your family. See this 1992 DVC video and how many times they mention "family."
Fingers crossed!!!!Reading this discussion made me wonder whether LSL might have some king-bed studios or duos, since the duos are so popular. I even had the really wild idea that maybe LSL would be all DVC, and the wing that was previously supposed to be cash hotel rooms would instead become DVC resort studios like VGF, with a large number having king beds. If DVC wanted to create a king bed studio category, LSL would be the chance to do it.
There is a big difference between turning away an interested purchaser and how something is marketed. Most timeshares are marketed as something to enjoy with family, and those that are forever contracts market them as a multigenerational "gift" of lifetime vacations to your heirs. While DVC has specific contract end dates, it was marketed originally as spending quality time and making memories with all the generations of your family. See this 1992 DVC video and how many times they mention "family."
But I do think 70% can still be accurate if you're booking the right rooms... having not actually done the math.I always remember the DVC marketing flyerā¦
āSave up to 70% on vacation accommodationsā
(Later changed to 50%)
Seems to me it was marketed as a way to vacation for less money.
But I do think 70% can still be accurate if you're booking the right rooms... having not actually done the math.
We are DINKS so studios and, in theory Duo Studios, align perfectly with us. And the truth of the matter is itās Disney, they could sell a 20 sq foot box that you sleep standing up in and someone would buy it. And while I would stay in a duo, it would be a last resort for me and I wouldnāt be particularly happy about it. Iām fine with the room size, I generally could care less how big the room is (sometime I do want to splurge), but the bed is the dealbreaker for me. A Murphy bed for 2 adults just isnāt my preferred sleep surface. Shove a king bed in there and Iād be fine.Obviously couples are a thing with DVC or duo studios wouldnt exist. They tested it at Riv and it was booked enough for them to do it again at Poly and vdh.