BJSforVols
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2012
- Messages
- 345
Thanks! Looking at those, I think I am going to miss the hat. Seems kind of blah without it.
I agree with you!
Thanks! Looking at those, I think I am going to miss the hat. Seems kind of blah without it.
Thanks! Looking at those, I think I am going to miss the hat. Seems kind of blah without it.
Yup. It went up in 2001, so if you visited MGM on any of the first three trips in your signature, you saw the park heartless.
There's the $64 question. They may not leave it empty--they may put something in there that's even worse than the hat.

Good news! For everyone who likes the hat, here's a photo of what it will look like once it's relocated.
Yup. It went up in 2001, so if you visited MGM on any of the first three trips in your signature, you saw the park heartless.
Yup. It went up in 2001, so if you visited MGM on any of the first three trips in your signature, you saw the park heartless.


Good news! For everyone who likes the hat, here's a photo of what it will look like once it's relocated.
![]()

1) So, YOU were the TWO people in the known universe that liked the hat. 2) Always wondered who they were.![]()
I don't mind the old view, but the ear tower as the icon then? Compared to Tree of Like, Castle and SE-could really use something IMO.

In the "new" Disney infomercials on Discovery Channel and Travel Channel, the Earful Tower is prominent, and no Hat. I think that is going to be the new Icon.

This debate pretty much break down to, generally, those that visited the park during the first decade and experienced the Imagineers' original Hollywood Blvd vignette don't like the hat, FOR ITS' LOCATION, and those that have never experienced the park without the hat can't imagine it without.