What keeps it fresh for us is the ability to take guests with us who've either never been to Disney or haven't been in ages. Watching them is an exhilirating experience in itself. Of course, I'm content to go anytime with anybody.
Our last trip we took seven guests, and we toured commando-style, just to expose them to some of everything, and I will tell you that by day four of park assaults, we were draggin' and that BW Villa was mighty inviting. But DW noted, as we were leaving the Indy stunt show, "You know, this hasn't been changed in years, and it's getting a little tired." I agreed. So, change is good, especially if it keeps my Favorite Place solvent and full of guests. I'd hate for a family with teenagers to bypass WDW because there was "nothing for them to do."
Disney has added some white-knuckle rides as of late, but even those are pretty benign as compared to some of the gut-churners at IOA. Rock 'n Roller Coaster, while certainly a thrill-ride, is glassy smooth and gentle, in spite of the fact that you're being inverted several times. I'll grant that it helps to have a cast-iron stomach for Mission:Space (we all loved it, btw.) I completely agree with puffkin ... I think Disney's doing a jam-up job of providing a comprehensive entertainment mix. I'll bet when the Matterhorn was new at
Disneyland, it was considered a thrill ride by any standards. But if you compare Disney attractions with the coasters, say, at Cedar Point, there's absolutely no comparison.
The carousel for little bitty dudes, R&RC for teen speed junkies, and plenty more for everyone together, yes? If you see an attraction that doesn't appeal to you, walk past it and try something else.
I do miss Horizons, tho.
Sorry. Back OT. Having
DVC is different, but for all the right reasons. This Thanksgiving, for example, we're doing Cirque for the first time, gonna shop a lot, and go to Universal for the first time in a couple of years. If the weather's nice, we'll boat all over Bay Lake.
It's all good.