ChloroformSdxn
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2015
- Messages
- 346
The sustainable label can be good or bad depending on who it comes from. One of our problems has been that a large org which puts those labels on the fish gets a significant amount of their operating budget from industry. Not always a bad thing, if their recommendations are in line with the rest of the scientific community. And even the questionable certifications are still generally good, there are just a few fisheries that might not be perfect (for example, most people I know don't think we have enough data to say definitively if there is a sustainable Chilean Seabass/toothfish fishery.)The big thing here now in the stores is "Sustainable" fish. I noticed today that none of the wild caught fish are labeled as sustainable, only the farmed. Wonder what's up with that?
Most consumers though, don't know the ins and outs of fish, and the label doesn't always tell you where it's from. Some fish have several different common names (mahimahi, dorado, dolphinfish, are all the same), and depending on where and how they're fish, could be good or bad. Most restaurants you go to do not know where their fish are from, and could very well be serving you a completely different fish than the one you're buying. It's really hard to make good choices, so the labels are a good start.
As far as salmon being actually wild, well, hatcheries are necessary. Many of the rivers which salmon use traditionally to spawn are compromised (development, pollution, etc.), so the salmon are intercepted, their eggs harvested, and then hatches offsite.