wilderness01 said:
As far as having no thought in "just sending out a photo" instead of handwriting a card, come on now! That comment is harsh don't you think? What could be more personal than sending out a picture of the most important people in your life?
What is personal to me about a picture of the most important people in YOUR life? If I'm already close to you, I know what your kid/dog/house looks like, and if I'm not close to you I really don't care that much. I mean, it's nice to look at for a minute, but beyond a glance and thinking "Your kid/dog/house sure is big/cute/expensive-looking", it doesn't have much impact for me and will be forgotten in a few minutes. I'm not offended to get them, I just don't really value them all that much.
I honestly think they're kind of self serving. People talk about the effort of getting their kids dressed up, taking the photos, and picking them out, but I think that effort benefits them more than anyone else. It doesn't have to be done, so there must be something about it that people enjoy. And that's fine, but don't pass it of to me as concern or effort on my behalf. Plus, if we're being honest (or cynical--take your pick

) don't people kind of use them to show off? The message usually seems to be "Admire my kid/dog/house".
Think about the pre-printed and photo holiday cards. If you accidentally put someone else's in my envelope, would it matter? If the answer is no, there's nothing personal about it.
To me, a personal holiday card would include at least a brief note relating specifically to the recipient--maybe recalling good times had over the past year and expressing a wish for good fortune for the next year. I realize that's very time consuming, but it's so much more meaningful that something that comes in a box of 100. I would rather not send cards at all than send something generic.
I realize I'm in the minority here, and that the photo/pre-printed cards are probably here to stay, but I really don't think they're equivalent to an "real" Christmas card.