mentos
Minty fresh happy haunts
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2017
- Messages
- 971
Answering for my daughter, who will probably guide the ride selection, hahah:
DL: Alice in Wonderland, HMH (if available)
DCA: Soarin'
Random thought time
In 2005, the California Supreme Court ruled that Disneyland is a "common carrier" and that its rides (specifically, Indiana Jones) are in the same class of transportation as city buses, trains, and airplanes. This originally dealt a blow to Disney as they argued they were not common carriers in the traditional sense and thus not subject to the higher duty of care imposed on common carriers.
IMO - that ruling means Disneyland can legally open its rides today. Obviously, there are other considerations (PR, threat of lawsuits, employee pushback, liability, optics, etc...), but if we hold to that ruling, Disneyland has the absolute right to operate rides as a common carrier.
The case was GOMEZ v. The Walt Disney Company et al., and it stemmed from the untimely death of Cristina Moreno in 2000 of a subarachnoid hemorrhage subsequent to riding the Indiana Jones ride at DL.
ETA: Disney's legal ability to open just might stem from English Common Law, specifically a 1680 court ruling regarding a horse. Man, I'm in the weeds here, hahah.
DL: Alice in Wonderland, HMH (if available)
DCA: Soarin'
Random thought time
In 2005, the California Supreme Court ruled that Disneyland is a "common carrier" and that its rides (specifically, Indiana Jones) are in the same class of transportation as city buses, trains, and airplanes. This originally dealt a blow to Disney as they argued they were not common carriers in the traditional sense and thus not subject to the higher duty of care imposed on common carriers.
IMO - that ruling means Disneyland can legally open its rides today. Obviously, there are other considerations (PR, threat of lawsuits, employee pushback, liability, optics, etc...), but if we hold to that ruling, Disneyland has the absolute right to operate rides as a common carrier.
The case was GOMEZ v. The Walt Disney Company et al., and it stemmed from the untimely death of Cristina Moreno in 2000 of a subarachnoid hemorrhage subsequent to riding the Indiana Jones ride at DL.
ETA: Disney's legal ability to open just might stem from English Common Law, specifically a 1680 court ruling regarding a horse. Man, I'm in the weeds here, hahah.
Last edited: