kristensideaoffun
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,227
If you are used to the bubble that is staying onsite at WDW, you may want to consider staying onsite if this is going to be a rare trip to Disneyland. We are WDW veterans, and we just moved to Southern California in June. We did our first trip to Disneyland in June, and we stayed at a motel on Harbor. It was shocking to this WDW on site girl how different it felt with all the homeless people, the guy with the parrot, the people sleeping in the bus stops. We stayed at the DLH in October, and I loved it. However, I have adjusted my expectations, because we come up from San Diego monthly, and we just can’t drop $400 plus per night that frequently. However, if we were rich, I’d never stay offsite. It would be the GCH or DLH all the way.
That being said, the walk from the Courtyard Marriott is nicer than walking from the Katella direction. We stayed at Hotel Indigo on Katella once, and I really disliked the walk. Homeless people literally everywhere and people handing out leaflets etc. It is just so different from staying onsite!
Fellow San Diegan here... I feel you! We love DLH but can’t stay there every time we go up there (Flex Pass APs). If we could, we would. We stick to the Courtyard Marriott or the Residence Inn by the Convention Center for our non-DLH stays. When we stay at RI, we walk through the GC and call a Lyft from the GC pick-up area to take us back to RI. On the way to the parks in the morning, there doesn’t seem to be much of a homeless presence (if any). I am looking forward to the new Westin! We stayed a couple times at Hotel Anabelle before it was knocked down for the Westin. It wasn’t a terrible walk. Definitely longer than walking from RI, but you are wrapped in the Disney bubble as soon you cross Katella and it doesn’t feel as long.