Elk Grove Chris -
No, I don't have an external hard drive but $150 is not a bad investment for something that will back up thousands of files. When my PC had its major crash 2 years ago, all of my files were wiped out. Then, using a recovery program, many of the files (though not all of them) were recovered along with a bunch of junk files...but the file names were all scrambled and unrecognizable. So what was originally called, for example, "
Disneyland - December 14, 2010 - Golden Gate Bridge - 2A" was called (after the file recovery) "SssFft445793&-hjJki"!

Seeing as I had thousands of documents, it was like looking through a needle in a haystack to locate a photo because of the messed up file names and junk files that were recovered along with the stuff I needed.
Thankfully, I had most of the lost photos sorted or organized in a couple of different places online so they were not totally lost forever, but I lost a lot of my clients' documents that I was saving for them for ongoing reference and projects.
After the major crash, I saved some things in my Yahoo mail as an extra back-up (as I mentioned before, I have found that it is a good idea to back up certain things in as many places as possible), in addition to saving to various flash drives or thumb drives or elsewhere, but then the Yahoo mail was wiped out over a week ago!
Darn that technology - we can't live with it and cannot live without it. We cannot rely on it or trust it, and yet we have to rely on it and trust it!
Trish -
I thought that Webshots had stopped hosting images or done something that made thousands of users angry towards the end of last year, didn't they? Or maybe I'm mistaken. I recall fellow DIS'er Mariezp having to remove all of her stuff from Webshots and all of her links in threads becoming invalid or broken. She was in search of a new site to use and she thought she was going to go with SmugMug.
Honestly, I would
not recommend Photobucket to anyone at the present time. If you read the comments on the Photobucket Facebook page (under any of their posts) or in the Support section of the Photobucket site, you will see that there are thousands of people angry over the current site because it is incomplete and full of bugs. They took away a lot of features without warning, and people are not pleased. They are currently forcing everyone into this new version of their site and it is messed up.
Until Photobucket re-implements some of the features they removed and gets the bugs worked out soon I would not refer anyone to them! Maybe in a few months they will be functioning a little better, but right now I would advise anyone who is not already a Photobucket member to steer clear. If I had a new batch of hundreds or thousands of photos that needed to be uploaded today, I would not load them to Photobucket and I have a paid account with them. I would either hold the photos and wait a couple of months to see what they do, or I would find another image hosting site.
Try SmugMug (DIS'er brookelizabeth uses this site and likes it), Image Shack (you can choose the size of the photos before uploading) or Flickr - in fact, DIS'er
mvf-m11c (Bret) takes thousands of photos for each of his trip reports and he is a faithful Flickr member. He loves it. So if he can load thousands of photos to Flickr on a regular basis, I assume that it is a decent site.